PSET vs. IUSG
PSET (Principal Quality ETF) and IUSG (iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - PSET tracks the NASDAQ US Price Setters while IUSG tracks the S&P 900 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSET returned 12.55%/yr vs 17.74%/yr for IUSG. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSET charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for IUSG.
Performance
PSET vs. IUSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSET achieves a -2.15% return, which is significantly lower than IUSG's 8.94% return. Over the past 10 years, PSET has underperformed IUSG with an annualized return of 12.55%, while IUSG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.74% annualized return.
PSET
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -1.25%
- YTD
- -2.15%
- 6M
- -3.42%
- 1Y
- 4.23%
- 3Y*
- 11.59%
- 5Y*
- 8.13%
- 10Y*
- 12.55%
IUSG
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -2.08%
- YTD
- 8.94%
- 6M
- 7.38%
- 1Y
- 24.89%
- 3Y*
- 24.91%
- 5Y*
- 13.70%
- 10Y*
- 17.74%
PSET vs. IUSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSET Principal Quality ETF | -2.15% | 7.27% | 17.65% | 24.07% | -16.52% | 29.59% | 16.20% | 34.85% | -2.29% | 24.63% |
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 8.94% | 21.23% | 34.70% | 29.28% | -28.81% | 31.26% | 32.65% | 30.62% | -0.79% | 27.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSET and IUSG is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2016 | 0.70 |
The correlation between PSET and IUSG shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (all time) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PSET vs. IUSG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSET
IUSG
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
PSET
IUSG
Industrials
PSET
IUSG
Financial Services
PSET
IUSG
Healthcare
PSET
IUSG
Communication Services
PSET
IUSG
Consumer Cyclical
PSET
IUSG
Basic Materials
PSET
IUSG
Energy
PSET
IUSG
Consumer Defensive
PSET
IUSG
Real Estate
PSET
-
IUSG
Utilities
PSET
-
IUSG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSET vs. IUSG — Risk / Return Rank
PSET
IUSG
PSET vs. IUSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Quality ETF (PSET) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSET | IUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.26 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.33 | 1.91 | -1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.08 | 7.76 | -6.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSET vs. IUSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSET drawdown since its inception was -34.74%, smaller than the maximum IUSG drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSET and IUSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSET | IUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.74% | -63.41% | +28.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.94% | -13.07% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.96% | -22.28% | +0.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.61% | -32.21% | +6.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.74% | -32.35% | -2.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.22% | -5.45% | +1.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.58% | -21.40% | +16.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.91% | 3.22% | +0.69% |
Volatility
PSET vs. IUSG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal Quality ETF (PSET) is 4.30%, while iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that PSET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSET | IUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.30% | 7.16% | -2.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.23% | 13.61% | -3.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.93% | 16.89% | -3.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.58% | 21.06% | -3.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.10% | 20.48% | -2.38% |
PSET vs. IUSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSET has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PSET vs. IUSG - Dividend Comparison
PSET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, more than IUSG's 0.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 0.51% | 0.53% | 0.59% | 1.12% | 1.07% | 0.59% | 0.93% | 1.64% | 1.32% | 1.28% | 1.48% | 1.29% |
PSET Principal Quality ETF | 0.64% | 0.59% | 0.69% | 0.85% | 1.47% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 1.52% | 1.33% | 1.02% | 1.26% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSET and IUSG have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IUSG has higher volatility (7.16%) compared to PSET (4.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSET dropped -34.74% vs IUSG's -63.41%.
On 10-year performance, IUSG leads with 17.74% vs 12.55% for PSET. On fees, IUSG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, PSET has been the lower-risk option at 4.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IUSG has performed better with a 17.74% return vs 12.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IUSG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for PSET.
PSET has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.51% for IUSG.
PSET tracks NASDAQ US Price Setters, while IUSG tracks S&P 900 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Principal and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for PSET and 0.04% for IUSG.
IUSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSET and IUSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer