PSDYX vs. FCNVX
PSDYX (Putnam Ultra Short Duration Income Fund) and FCNVX (Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, PSDYX returned 2.56%/yr vs 2.61%/yr for FCNVX. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PSDYX charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FCNVX.
Performance
PSDYX vs. FCNVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PSDYX having a 1.78% return and FCNVX slightly higher at 1.82%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PSDYX having a 2.56% annualized return and FCNVX not far ahead at 2.61%.
PSDYX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- 6M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- 1.78%
- 1Y
- 4.25%
- 3Y*
- 4.80%
- 5Y*
- 3.45%
- 10Y*
- 2.56%
FCNVX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- YTD
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- 4.09%
- 3Y*
- 4.96%
- 5Y*
- 3.66%
- 10Y*
- 2.61%
PSDYX vs. FCNVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSDYX Putnam Ultra Short Duration Income Fund | 1.78% | 4.99% | 5.25% | 4.78% | 0.61% | 0.07% | 1.50% | 2.86% | 1.95% | 1.40% |
FCNVX Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class | 1.82% | 4.51% | 5.43% | 5.86% | 0.85% | -0.06% | 1.10% | 3.00% | 1.82% | 1.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSDYX and FCNVX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012 | 0.47 |
The correlation between PSDYX and FCNVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (3 years) to 0.52 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSDYX vs. FCNVX — Risk / Return Rank
PSDYX
FCNVX
PSDYX vs. FCNVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Ultra Short Duration Income Fund (PSDYX) and Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSDYX | FCNVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.65 | 8.77 | -5.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.67 | 41.30 | -32.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 43.02 | 132.04 | -89.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSDYX vs. FCNVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSDYX drawdown since its inception was -2.58%, which is greater than FCNVX's maximum drawdown of -2.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSDYX and FCNVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSDYX | FCNVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.58% | -2.19% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.49% | -0.10% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.49% | -0.30% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.80% | -0.59% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -2.58% | -2.19% | -0.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.07% | -0.05% | -0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.10% | 0.03% | +0.07% |
Volatility
PSDYX vs. FCNVX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Putnam Ultra Short Duration Income Fund (PSDYX) is 0.37%, while Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX) has a volatility of 0.40%. This indicates that PSDYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCNVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSDYX | FCNVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.37% | 0.40% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.92% | 0.81% | +0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36% | 1.18% | +0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.31% | 1.30% | +0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.06% | 1.05% | +0.01% |
PSDYX vs. FCNVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSDYX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNVX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSDYX vs. FCNVX - Dividend Comparison
PSDYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, more than FCNVX's 4.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCNVX Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class | 4.10% | 4.41% | 5.17% | 4.97% | 1.24% | 0.24% | 0.99% | 2.45% | 2.21% | 1.30% | 1.01% | 0.48% |
PSDYX Putnam Ultra Short Duration Income Fund | 4.36% | 4.65% | 4.81% | 3.65% | 1.30% | 0.37% | 1.09% | 2.51% | 2.23% | 1.29% | 0.88% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSDYX and FCNVX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FCNVX has higher volatility (0.40%) compared to PSDYX (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSDYX dropped -2.58% vs FCNVX's -2.19%.
FCNVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.47 vs 3.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSDYX and FCNVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer