PSCX vs. IBIC
PSCX (Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSCX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Pacer, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. PSCX is actively managed, while IBIC is passively managed. Over the past year, PSCX returned 15.49% vs 4.54% for IBIC. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. PSCX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.
Performance
PSCX vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCX achieves a 5.11% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.37% return.
PSCX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 2.00%
- YTD
- 5.11%
- 6M
- 5.98%
- 1Y
- 15.49%
- 3Y*
- 12.85%
- 5Y*
- 8.46%
- 10Y*
- —
IBIC
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 2.37%
- 6M
- 2.51%
- 1Y
- 4.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSCX vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF | 5.11% | 12.08% | 13.27% | 4.23% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 2.37% | 4.96% | 5.25% | 2.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCX and IBIC is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2023 | -0.04 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between PSCX and IBIC has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.04 to -0.26, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCX vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank
PSCX
IBIC
PSCX vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSCX | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 2.24 | -0.66 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 17.27 | -13.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.94 | 67.45 | -48.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSCX | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.82 | 5.05 | -2.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.27 | 3.49 | -2.22 |
Drawdowns
PSCX vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCX drawdown since its inception was -10.20%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCX and IBIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCX | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.20% | -0.90% | -9.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.20% | -0.26% | -3.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -0.13% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.87% | -0.10% | -1.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.82% | 0.07% | +0.75% |
Volatility
PSCX vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) has a higher volatility of 0.89% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.33%. This indicates that PSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCX | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.89% | 0.33% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.21% | 0.67% | +3.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.53% | 0.90% | +4.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.07% | 1.58% | +5.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.96% | 1.58% | +5.38% |
PSCX vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSCX vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison
PSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 3.59% | 4.43% | 4.65% | 0.83% |
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCX and IBIC have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSCX has higher volatility (0.89%) compared to IBIC (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCX dropped -10.20% vs IBIC's -0.90%.
On 1-year performance, PSCX leads with 15.49% vs 4.54% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PSCX has performed better with a 15.49% return vs 4.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSCX.
IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 0.00% for PSCX.
PSCX is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PSCX and 0.10% for IBIC.
IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.05 vs 2.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSCX and IBIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer