PSCX vs. FEAC
PSCX (Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF) and FEAC (Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PSCX returned 15.32% vs 29.45% for FEAC. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PSCX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for FEAC.
Performance
PSCX vs. FEAC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCX achieves a 4.98% return, which is significantly lower than FEAC's 11.54% return.
PSCX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 4.98%
- 6M
- 5.15%
- 1Y
- 15.32%
- 3Y*
- 12.42%
- 5Y*
- 8.36%
- 10Y*
- —
FEAC
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 11.54%
- 6M
- 10.76%
- 1Y
- 29.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSCX vs. FEAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF | 4.98% | 12.08% | 0.59% |
FEAC Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF | 11.54% | 18.01% | -1.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCX and FEAC is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2024 | 0.88 |
The correlation between PSCX and FEAC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCX vs. FEAC — Risk / Return Rank
PSCX
FEAC
PSCX vs. FEAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) and Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSCX | FEAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.40 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | 3.63 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.42 | 15.27 | +3.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSCX vs. FEAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCX drawdown since its inception was -10.20%, smaller than the maximum FEAC drawdown of -18.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCX and FEAC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCX | FEAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.20% | -18.96% | +8.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.20% | -8.15% | +3.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -1.31% | +1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.85% | -2.53% | +0.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.83% | 1.93% | -1.10% |
Volatility
PSCX vs. FEAC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) is 1.71%, while Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC) has a volatility of 5.13%. This indicates that PSCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCX | FEAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.71% | 5.13% | -3.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.49% | 10.13% | -5.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.63% | 13.24% | -7.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.11% | 17.62% | -10.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.97% | 17.62% | -10.65% |
PSCX vs. FEAC - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FEAC's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSCX vs. FEAC - Dividend Comparison
PSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FEAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FEAC Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF | 0.77% | 0.94% | 0.12% |
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCX and FEAC have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FEAC has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to PSCX (1.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCX dropped -10.20% vs FEAC's -18.96%.
On 1-year performance, FEAC leads with 29.45% vs 15.32% for PSCX. On fees, FEAC is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, PSCX has been the lower-risk option at 1.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FEAC has performed better with a 29.45% return vs 15.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FEAC is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSCX.
FEAC has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.00% for PSCX.
They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PSCX and 0.18% for FEAC.
PSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSCX and FEAC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer