PSCW vs. NVDO
PSCW (Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF) and NVDO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PSCW charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for NVDO.
Performance
PSCW vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCW achieves a 7.56% return, which is significantly lower than NVDO's 21.85% return.
PSCW
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 1.39%
- YTD
- 7.56%
- 6M
- 8.72%
- 1Y
- 15.21%
- 3Y*
- 11.75%
- 5Y*
- 7.29%
- 10Y*
- —
NVDO
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 16.94%
- YTD
- 21.85%
- 6M
- 31.84%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSCW vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PSCW Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF | 7.56% | 3.13% |
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF | 21.85% | 11.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCW and NVDO is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCW vs. NVDO — Risk / Return Rank
PSCW
NVDO
PSCW vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF (PSCW) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSCW | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.90 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 6.54 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.92 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.51 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 53.89 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSCW | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | 1.45 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
PSCW vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCW drawdown since its inception was -11.89%, smaller than the maximum NVDO drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCW and NVDO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCW | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.89% | -16.25% | +4.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.23% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.18% | -5.00% | +2.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.29% | — | — |
Volatility
PSCW vs. NVDO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCW | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.64% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.47% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.94% | 31.88% | -27.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.64% | 31.88% | -24.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.60% | 31.88% | -24.28% |
PSCW vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCW has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSCW vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison
PSCW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.67%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF | 13.67% | 16.66% |
PSCW Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCW and NVDO have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PSCW is cheaper at 0.61% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PSCW is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for NVDO.
NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 13.67%, compared with 0.00% for PSCW.
They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for PSCW and 0.77% for NVDO.
Find the right allocation for PSCW and NVDO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer