PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSCW vs. OCTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PSCW vs. OCTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF (PSCW) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF (OCTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PSCW vs. OCTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PSCW
Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF
1.91%6.56%12.95%11.44%-5.52%6.27%
OCTZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF
-3.41%12.89%18.89%18.18%-10.23%14.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSCW achieves a 1.91% return, which is significantly higher than OCTZ's -3.41% return.


PSCW

1D
0.60%
1M
0.85%
YTD
1.91%
6M
3.81%
1Y
12.27%
3Y*
10.73%
5Y*
10Y*

OCTZ

1D
2.03%
1M
-3.58%
YTD
-3.41%
6M
-1.67%
1Y
12.51%
3Y*
13.32%
5Y*
9.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PSCW vs. OCTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSCW has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than OCTZ's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PSCW vs. OCTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSCW
PSCW Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
PSCW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCW Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCW Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

OCTZ
OCTZ Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
OCTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OCTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
OCTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
OCTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
OCTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSCW vs. OCTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF (PSCW) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF (OCTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSCWOCTZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.54

0.92

+0.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.31

1.40

+0.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.20

+0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

1.41

+0.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.94

6.21

+7.73

PSCW vs. OCTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSCW Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the OCTZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSCW and OCTZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSCWOCTZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

0.92

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.91

-0.05

Correlation

The correlation between PSCW and OCTZ is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

PSCW vs. OCTZ - Dividend Comparison

PSCW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OCTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%.


TTM2025202420232022
PSCW
Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OCTZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF
4.13%3.99%1.26%3.28%0.67%

Drawdowns

PSCW vs. OCTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCW drawdown since its inception was -11.89%, smaller than the maximum OCTZ drawdown of -15.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCW and OCTZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PSCWOCTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.89%

-15.82%

+3.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.16%

-9.09%

+2.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.43%

+5.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.26%

-3.23%

+0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

2.06%

-1.13%

Volatility

PSCW vs. OCTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF (PSCW) is 1.44%, while TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF (OCTZ) has a volatility of 4.09%. This indicates that PSCW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OCTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PSCWOCTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.44%

4.09%

-2.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.50%

7.56%

-5.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.03%

13.64%

-5.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.69%

12.41%

-4.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.69%

12.45%

-4.76%