PSCU vs. NFRX
PSCU (Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF) and NFRX (Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds. PSCU is passively managed, while NFRX is actively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PSCU charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for NFRX.
Performance
PSCU vs. NFRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PSCU
- 1D
- -2.32%
- 1M
- -2.43%
- YTD
- 12.29%
- 6M
- 10.22%
- 1Y
- 18.43%
- 3Y*
- 6.90%
- 5Y*
- 0.96%
- 10Y*
- 5.81%
NFRX
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -2.45%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSCU vs. NFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PSCU Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF | 9.18% |
NFRX Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF | 4.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCU and NFRX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2026 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCU vs. NFRX — Risk / Return Rank
PSCU
NFRX
PSCU vs. NFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF (PSCU) and Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF (NFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSCU | NFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.64 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSCU | NFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 1.08 | -0.61 |
Drawdowns
PSCU vs. NFRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCU drawdown since its inception was -29.97%, which is greater than NFRX's maximum drawdown of -7.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCU and NFRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCU | NFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.97% | -7.26% | -22.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.46% | -4.73% | +1.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.67% | -2.60% | -5.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.28% | — | — |
Volatility
PSCU vs. NFRX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCU | NFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.04% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.07% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.81% | 14.36% | +1.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.42% | 14.36% | +4.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.47% | 14.36% | +5.11% |
PSCU vs. NFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCU has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than NFRX's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSCU vs. NFRX - Dividend Comparison
PSCU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than NFRX's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFRX Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSCU Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF | 0.99% | 1.10% | 0.98% | 1.60% | 1.71% | 2.69% | 1.20% | 2.47% | 2.35% | 1.84% | 6.93% | 2.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCU and NFRX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PSCU is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PSCU is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for NFRX.
PSCU has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.22% for NFRX.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Harrison Street. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCU and 0.80% for NFRX.
Find the right allocation for PSCU and NFRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer