PSCU vs. ISCMF
PSCU (Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF) and ISCMF (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSCU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Capped Utilities & Communication Services Index, while ISCMF is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PSCU returned 8.44%/yr vs 16.78%/yr for ISCMF. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. PSCU charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ISCMF.
Performance
PSCU vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCU achieves a 10.26% return, which is significantly lower than ISCMF's 22.87% return.
PSCU
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- -1.49%
- YTD
- 10.26%
- 6M
- 10.07%
- 1Y
- 16.92%
- 3Y*
- 8.44%
- 5Y*
- 0.37%
- 10Y*
- 5.18%
ISCMF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -4.99%
- YTD
- 22.87%
- 6M
- 22.87%
- 1Y
- 31.30%
- 3Y*
- 16.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSCU vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCU Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF | 10.26% | -1.93% | 10.68% | 2.12% | -14.34% |
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 22.87% | 19.65% | 3.13% | -9.58% | -5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCU and ISCMF is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2022 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCU vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank
PSCU
ISCMF
PSCU vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF (PSCU) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSCU | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 2.31 | -1.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.04 | 5.53 | -3.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.04 | 11.95 | -6.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSCU vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCU drawdown since its inception was -29.97%, which is greater than ISCMF's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCU and ISCMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCU | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.97% | -25.42% | -4.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.32% | -5.69% | -2.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.55% | -7.62% | -15.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.20% | -5.26% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.65% | -13.36% | +5.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.36% | 2.63% | +0.73% |
Volatility
PSCU vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF (PSCU) is 4.85%, while iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) has a volatility of 5.11%. This indicates that PSCU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISCMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCU | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.85% | 5.11% | -0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.19% | 15.45% | -4.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.88% | 17.87% | -1.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.43% | 14.29% | +4.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.50% | 14.29% | +5.21% |
PSCU vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCU has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSCU vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison
PSCU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, while ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSCU Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF | 1.05% | 1.10% | 0.98% | 1.60% | 1.71% | 2.69% | 1.20% | 2.47% | 2.35% | 1.84% | 6.93% | 2.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCU and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ISCMF has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to PSCU (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCU dropped -29.97% vs ISCMF's -25.42%.
On 3-year performance, ISCMF leads with 16.78% vs 8.44% for PSCU. On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, PSCU has been the lower-risk option at 4.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ISCMF has performed better with a 16.78% return vs 8.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PSCU.
PSCU has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.
PSCU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while ISCMF is Commodities. PSCU tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Capped Utilities & Communication Services Index, while ISCMF tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCU and 0.19% for ISCMF.
ISCMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSCU and ISCMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer