PSCU vs. ECLN
PSCU (Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF) and ECLN (First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds. PSCU is passively managed, while ECLN is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSCU returned 0.96%/yr vs 11.85%/yr for ECLN. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSCU charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for ECLN.
Performance
PSCU vs. ECLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PSCU having a 12.29% return and ECLN slightly lower at 12.15%.
PSCU
- 1D
- -2.32%
- 1M
- -2.43%
- YTD
- 12.29%
- 6M
- 10.22%
- 1Y
- 18.43%
- 3Y*
- 6.90%
- 5Y*
- 0.96%
- 10Y*
- 5.81%
ECLN
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -2.95%
- YTD
- 12.15%
- 6M
- 10.16%
- 1Y
- 19.15%
- 3Y*
- 17.15%
- 5Y*
- 11.85%
- 10Y*
- —
PSCU vs. ECLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCU Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF | 12.29% | -1.93% | 10.68% | 2.12% | -19.73% | 30.12% | 3.80% | 2.65% |
ECLN First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF | 12.15% | 16.78% | 22.60% | -3.36% | 5.28% | 12.26% | 8.98% | 5.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCU and ECLN is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2019 | 0.58 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PSCU and ECLN has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PSCU vs. ECLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSCU
ECLN
Communication Services
-
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Technology
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Communication Services
PSCU
ECLN
-
Utilities
PSCU
ECLN
Consumer Cyclical
PSCU
ECLN
-
Industrials
PSCU
ECLN
Real Estate
PSCU
ECLN
-
Technology
PSCU
ECLN
Financial Services
PSCU
ECLN
-
Basic Materials
PSCU
-
ECLN
-
Consumer Defensive
PSCU
-
ECLN
-
Energy
PSCU
-
ECLN
Healthcare
PSCU
-
ECLN
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCU vs. ECLN — Risk / Return Rank
PSCU
ECLN
PSCU vs. ECLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF (PSCU) and First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ECLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSCU | ECLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.32 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | 3.83 | -1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.64 | 10.36 | -4.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSCU | ECLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 1.83 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 0.84 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.67 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
PSCU vs. ECLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCU drawdown since its inception was -29.97%, smaller than the maximum ECLN drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCU and ECLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCU | ECLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.97% | -32.28% | +2.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.32% | -5.02% | -3.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.55% | -14.68% | -8.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.97% | -19.88% | -10.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.46% | -3.65% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.67% | -4.99% | -2.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.28% | 1.86% | +1.42% |
Volatility
PSCU vs. ECLN - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF (PSCU) has a higher volatility of 5.04% compared to First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ECLN) at 3.85%. This indicates that PSCU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCU | ECLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.04% | 3.85% | +1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.07% | 8.15% | +2.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.81% | 10.51% | +5.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.42% | 14.22% | +4.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.47% | 17.41% | +2.06% |
PSCU vs. ECLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCU has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than ECLN's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSCU vs. ECLN - Dividend Comparison
PSCU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than ECLN's 1.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECLN First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF | 1.83% | 1.97% | 2.52% | 2.54% | 1.72% | 1.66% | 1.68% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSCU Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF | 0.99% | 1.10% | 0.98% | 1.60% | 1.71% | 2.69% | 1.20% | 2.47% | 2.35% | 1.84% | 6.93% | 2.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCU and ECLN have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSCU has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to ECLN (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCU dropped -29.97% vs ECLN's -32.28%.
On 5-year performance, ECLN leads with 11.85% vs 0.96% for PSCU. On fees, PSCU is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, ECLN has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ECLN has performed better with a 11.85% return vs 0.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSCU is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for ECLN.
ECLN has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.99% for PSCU.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCU and 0.97% for ECLN.
ECLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSCU and ECLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer