PSCT vs. TINY
PSCT (Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF) and TINY (ProShares Nanotechnology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - PSCT tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Information Technology Index while TINY tracks the Solactive Nanotechnology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PSCT returned 23.44%/yr vs 31.25%/yr for TINY. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PSCT charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for TINY.
Performance
PSCT vs. TINY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCT achieves a 54.18% return, which is significantly lower than TINY's 59.78% return.
PSCT
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- 15.45%
- YTD
- 54.18%
- 6M
- 50.59%
- 1Y
- 98.87%
- 3Y*
- 23.44%
- 5Y*
- 13.84%
- 10Y*
- 16.70%
TINY
- 1D
- 2.63%
- 1M
- 15.50%
- YTD
- 59.78%
- 6M
- 60.21%
- 1Y
- 114.15%
- 3Y*
- 31.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSCT vs. TINY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCT Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF | 54.18% | 18.63% | -1.06% | 20.81% | -22.50% | 10.47% |
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF | 59.78% | 19.98% | 6.63% | 47.97% | -34.14% | 8.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCT and TINY is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021 | 0.84 |
The correlation between PSCT and TINY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
PSCT vs. TINY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSCT
TINY
Technology
Industrials
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
PSCT
TINY
Industrials
PSCT
TINY
Energy
PSCT
TINY
-
Financial Services
PSCT
TINY
-
Basic Materials
PSCT
-
TINY
Communication Services
PSCT
-
TINY
-
Consumer Cyclical
PSCT
-
TINY
-
Consumer Defensive
PSCT
-
TINY
-
Healthcare
PSCT
-
TINY
Real Estate
PSCT
-
TINY
-
Utilities
PSCT
-
TINY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCT vs. TINY — Risk / Return Rank
PSCT
TINY
PSCT vs. TINY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF (PSCT) and ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSCT | TINY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.52 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.72 | 6.85 | -0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.34 | 24.13 | +4.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSCT | TINY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.35 | 3.52 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.57 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
PSCT vs. TINY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCT drawdown since its inception was -40.44%, smaller than the maximum TINY drawdown of -43.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCT and TINY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCT | TINY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.44% | -43.79% | +3.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.80% | -16.75% | +1.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.96% | -42.13% | +8.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | 0.00% | -1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.91% | -16.16% | +8.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.50% | 4.75% | -1.25% |
Volatility
PSCT vs. TINY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF (PSCT) is 9.00%, while ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) has a volatility of 12.04%. This indicates that PSCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TINY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCT | TINY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.00% | 12.04% | -3.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.05% | 26.40% | -5.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.82% | 32.66% | -2.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.68% | 32.37% | -4.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.67% | 32.37% | -5.70% |
PSCT vs. TINY - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCT has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than TINY's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSCT vs. TINY - Dividend Comparison
PSCT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than TINY's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCT Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.08% | 0.22% | 0.47% | 0.19% | 0.25% | 0.15% |
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF | 0.18% | 0.29% | 0.01% | 0.35% | 0.42% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCT and TINY have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TINY has higher volatility (12.04%) compared to PSCT (9.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCT dropped -40.44% vs TINY's -43.79%.
On 3-year performance, TINY leads with 31.25% vs 23.44% for PSCT. On fees, PSCT is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PSCT has been the lower-risk option at 9.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TINY has performed better with a 31.25% return vs 23.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSCT is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for TINY.
TINY has the higher dividend yield at 0.18%, compared with 0.01% for PSCT.
PSCT tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Information Technology Index, while TINY tracks Solactive Nanotechnology Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCT and 0.58% for TINY.
TINY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.52 vs 3.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSCT and TINY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer