PSCT vs. STHH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PSCT (Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF) and STHH (STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged) are both Technology Equities funds - PSCT tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Information Technology Index while STHH tracks the STMicroelectronics NV Local Shares Total Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PSCT returned 98.87% vs 209.77% for STHH. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSCT charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for STHH.

Performance

PSCT vs. STHH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF (PSCT) and STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSCT achieves a 54.18% return, which is significantly lower than STHH's 209.56% return.

PSCT

• 1D: -1.18%
• 1M: 15.45%
• YTD: 54.18%
• 6M: 50.59%
• 1Y: 98.87%
• 3Y*: 23.44%
• 5Y*: 13.84%
• 10Y*: 16.70%

STHH

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 45.30%
• YTD: 209.56%
• 6M: 210.55%
• 1Y: 209.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSCT vs. STHH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PSCT Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF	54.18%	50.91%
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged	209.56%	16.74%

Correlation

The correlation between PSCT and STHH is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2025	0.65

The correlation between PSCT and STHH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PSCT vs. STHH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSCT

PSCT Risk / Return Rank: 89
PSCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
PSCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
PSCT Omega Ratio Rank: 81
PSCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
PSCT Martin Ratio Rank: 94

STHH

STHH Risk / Return Rank: 89
STHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
STHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
STHH Omega Ratio Rank: 91
STHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
STHH Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSCT vs. STHH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF (PSCT) and STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PSCT	STHH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.35	4.20	-0.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.88	4.20	-0.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.60	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.72	6.23	+0.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	28.34	14.15	+14.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PSCT vs. STHH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSCT Sharpe Ratio is 3.35, which is comparable to the STHH Sharpe Ratio of 4.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSCT and STHH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PSCT	STHH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.35	4.20	-0.85
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	4.44	-3.82

Drawdowns

PSCT vs. STHH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCT drawdown since its inception was -40.44%, which is greater than STHH's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCT and STHH.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSCT	STHH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.44%	-33.89%	-6.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.80%	-33.89%	+19.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.96%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.80%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.18%	0.00%	-1.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.91%	-10.46%	+2.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.50%	14.90%	-11.40%

Volatility

PSCT vs. STHH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF (PSCT) is 9.00%, while STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH) has a volatility of 20.33%. This indicates that PSCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STHH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSCT	STHH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.00%	20.33%	-11.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.05%	36.77%	-15.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.82%	50.39%	-20.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.68%	49.44%	-21.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.67%	49.44%	-22.77%

PSCT vs. STHH - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSCT has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than STHH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSCT vs. STHH - Dividend Comparison

PSCT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than STHH's 0.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PSCT Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF	0.01%	0.02%	0.01%	0.02%	0.00%	0.01%	0.08%	0.22%	0.47%	0.19%	0.25%	0.15%
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged	0.55%	0.69%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSCT and STHH in my portfolio?

PSCT and STHH have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSCT or STHH?

STHH has higher volatility (20.33%) compared to PSCT (9.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCT dropped -40.44% vs STHH's -33.89%.

Which ETF is better, PSCT or STHH?

On 1-year performance, STHH leads with 209.77% vs 98.87% for PSCT. On fees, STHH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, PSCT has been the lower-risk option at 9.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PSCT or STHH?

Over the 1-year period, STHH has performed better with a 209.77% return vs 98.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSCT or STHH?

STHH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PSCT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSCT or STHH?

STHH has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.01% for PSCT.

What is the main difference between PSCT and STHH?

PSCT tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Information Technology Index, while STHH tracks STMicroelectronics NV Local Shares Total Return. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCT and 0.19% for STHH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

STHH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.20 vs 3.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.