PSCM vs. XLG
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF (PSCM) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG).
PSCM and XLG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PSCM is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Small Cap 600 / Materials -SEC. It was launched on Apr 7, 2010. XLG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. It was launched on May 4, 2005. Both PSCM and XLG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
PSCM vs. XLG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PSCM vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCM Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF | 18.11% | 15.59% | 0.67% | 19.86% | -6.45% | 18.02% | 22.18% | 21.75% | -23.28% | 10.37% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | -7.82% | 19.51% | 33.49% | 38.16% | -24.29% | 30.77% | 24.15% | 32.04% | -3.59% | 23.04% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCM achieves a 18.11% return, which is significantly higher than XLG's -7.82% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCM has underperformed XLG with an annualized return of 13.09%, while XLG has yielded a comparatively higher 15.64% annualized return.
PSCM
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- 18.11%
- 6M
- 28.41%
- 1Y
- 50.44%
- 3Y*
- 14.75%
- 5Y*
- 10.33%
- 10Y*
- 13.09%
XLG
- 1D
- 3.26%
- 1M
- -4.33%
- YTD
- -7.82%
- 6M
- -4.84%
- 1Y
- 19.36%
- 3Y*
- 21.64%
- 5Y*
- 13.80%
- 10Y*
- 15.64%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PSCM vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCM has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PSCM vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank
PSCM
XLG
PSCM vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF (PSCM) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSCM | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.76 | 0.97 | +0.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.46 | 1.52 | +0.94 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.22 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | 1.60 | +1.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.86 | 5.67 | +5.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSCM | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.76 | 0.97 | +0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.74 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.83 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.58 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCM and XLG is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PSCM vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison
PSCM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, more than XLG's 0.70% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCM Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF | 1.09% | 1.17% | 0.80% | 0.81% | 0.93% | 0.67% | 1.56% | 1.14% | 1.25% | 0.61% | 0.76% | 1.33% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 0.70% | 0.64% | 0.72% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% |
Drawdowns
PSCM vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCM drawdown since its inception was -51.34%, roughly equal to the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCM and XLG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCM | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.34% | -52.39% | +1.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.76% | -12.41% | -5.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.36% | -28.02% | -7.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.34% | -30.46% | -20.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.39% | -9.56% | +5.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.99% | -7.69% | -3.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.60% | 3.49% | +1.11% |
Volatility
PSCM vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF (PSCM) has a higher volatility of 9.12% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) at 5.76%. This indicates that PSCM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PSCM | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.12% | 5.76% | +3.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.83% | 10.64% | +7.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.81% | 19.97% | +8.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.81% | 18.69% | +7.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.91% | 18.81% | +8.10% |