PSCM vs. MXI
PSCM (Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF) and MXI (iShares Global Materials ETF) are both Materials funds - PSCM tracks the S&P Small Cap 600 / Materials -SEC while MXI tracks the S&P Global Materials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSCM returned 12.85%/yr vs 11.38%/yr for MXI. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSCM charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for MXI.
Performance
PSCM vs. MXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCM achieves a 23.80% return, which is significantly higher than MXI's 11.62% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCM has outperformed MXI with an annualized return of 12.85%, while MXI has yielded a comparatively lower 11.38% annualized return.
PSCM
- 1D
- -2.69%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- YTD
- 23.80%
- 6M
- 22.73%
- 1Y
- 53.82%
- 3Y*
- 18.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.65%
- 10Y*
- 12.85%
MXI
- 1D
- -2.55%
- 1M
- -2.16%
- YTD
- 11.62%
- 6M
- 10.06%
- 1Y
- 29.81%
- 3Y*
- 13.19%
- 5Y*
- 6.60%
- 10Y*
- 11.38%
PSCM vs. MXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCM Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF | 23.80% | 15.59% | 0.67% | 19.86% | -6.45% | 18.02% | 22.18% | 21.75% | -23.28% | 10.37% |
MXI iShares Global Materials ETF | 11.62% | 27.43% | -8.25% | 14.37% | -9.09% | 15.06% | 22.31% | 22.19% | -16.06% | 30.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCM and MXI is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2010 | 0.67 |
The correlation between PSCM and MXI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
PSCM vs. MXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSCM
MXI
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
PSCM
MXI
Energy
PSCM
MXI
-
Consumer Cyclical
PSCM
MXI
Financial Services
PSCM
MXI
-
Communication Services
PSCM
-
MXI
-
Consumer Defensive
PSCM
-
MXI
Healthcare
PSCM
-
MXI
-
Industrials
PSCM
-
MXI
Real Estate
PSCM
-
MXI
-
Technology
PSCM
-
MXI
-
Utilities
PSCM
-
MXI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCM vs. MXI — Risk / Return Rank
PSCM
MXI
PSCM vs. MXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF (PSCM) and iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSCM | MXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.26 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.78 | 1.85 | +1.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.00 | 7.13 | +6.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSCM vs. MXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCM drawdown since its inception was -51.34%, smaller than the maximum MXI drawdown of -68.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCM and MXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCM | MXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.34% | -68.44% | +17.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.33% | -16.18% | +1.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.36% | -22.25% | -13.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.36% | -28.76% | -6.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.34% | -39.52% | -11.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.64% | -7.43% | +2.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.88% | -18.03% | +7.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.86% | 4.19% | -0.33% |
Volatility
PSCM vs. MXI - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF (PSCM) and iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI) have volatilities of 8.22% and 8.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCM | MXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.22% | 8.08% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.32% | 17.94% | -0.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.46% | 20.66% | +3.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.83% | 19.86% | +5.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.89% | 20.42% | +6.47% |
PSCM vs. MXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCM has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than MXI's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSCM vs. MXI - Dividend Comparison
PSCM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than MXI's 1.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXI iShares Global Materials ETF | 1.72% | 2.22% | 3.24% | 2.92% | 4.84% | 3.51% | 1.21% | 3.64% | 2.77% | 1.76% | 1.31% | 3.64% |
PSCM Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF | 0.97% | 1.17% | 0.80% | 0.81% | 0.93% | 0.67% | 1.56% | 1.14% | 1.25% | 0.61% | 0.76% | 1.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCM and MXI have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSCM has higher volatility (8.22%) compared to MXI (8.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCM dropped -51.34% vs MXI's -68.44%.
On 10-year performance, PSCM leads with 12.85% vs 11.38% for MXI. On fees, PSCM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, MXI has been the lower-risk option at 8.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PSCM has performed better with a 12.85% return vs 11.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSCM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for MXI.
MXI has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 0.97% for PSCM.
PSCM tracks S&P Small Cap 600 / Materials -SEC, while MXI tracks S&P Global Materials Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCM and 0.46% for MXI.
PSCM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSCM and MXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer