PSCF vs. DJP
PSCF (Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF) and DJP (iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - PSCF is a Financials Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Financials Index, while DJP is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSCF returned 7.53%/yr vs 6.43%/yr for DJP. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PSCF charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for DJP.
Performance
PSCF vs. DJP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCF achieves a 15.66% return, which is significantly lower than DJP's 19.91% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCF has outperformed DJP with an annualized return of 7.53%, while DJP has yielded a comparatively lower 6.43% annualized return.
PSCF
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 3.34%
- 6M
- 12.09%
- YTD
- 15.66%
- 1Y
- 20.98%
- 3Y*
- 18.03%
- 5Y*
- 5.66%
- 10Y*
- 7.53%
DJP
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -1.94%
- 6M
- 16.75%
- YTD
- 19.91%
- 1Y
- 29.52%
- 3Y*
- 13.06%
- 5Y*
- 10.88%
- 10Y*
- 6.43%
PSCF vs. DJP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCF Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF | 15.66% | 6.19% | 15.50% | 6.02% | -19.34% | 27.82% | -9.07% | 23.13% | -8.43% | 6.71% |
DJP iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN | 19.91% | 17.20% | 5.59% | -9.85% | 17.46% | 31.05% | -4.12% | 7.63% | -13.07% | 0.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCF and DJP is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2010 | 0.22 |
The correlation between PSCF and DJP shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCF vs. DJP — Risk / Return Rank
PSCF
DJP
PSCF vs. DJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF (PSCF) and iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN (DJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSCF | DJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.29 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 1.88 | +0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.39 | 6.29 | -0.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSCF vs. DJP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCF drawdown since its inception was -45.46%, smaller than the maximum DJP drawdown of -78.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCF and DJP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCF | DJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.46% | -78.35% | +32.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.91% | -16.42% | +6.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.34% | -16.42% | -7.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.77% | -28.98% | -7.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.46% | -38.36% | -7.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -38.33% | +37.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.54% | -50.79% | +42.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.72% | 4.89% | -1.17% |
Volatility
PSCF vs. DJP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF (PSCF) is 4.23%, while iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN (DJP) has a volatility of 4.94%. This indicates that PSCF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCF | DJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.23% | 4.94% | -0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.18% | 16.79% | -4.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.33% | 19.32% | -1.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.36% | 18.98% | +3.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.73% | 17.04% | +7.69% |
PSCF vs. DJP - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCF has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than DJP's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSCF vs. DJP - Dividend Comparison
PSCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, while DJP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DJP iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSCF Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF | 2.17% | 2.09% | 2.48% | 3.32% | 2.93% | 1.83% | 3.57% | 4.27% | 4.21% | 2.26% | 3.01% | 2.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCF and DJP have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DJP has higher volatility (4.94%) compared to PSCF (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCF dropped -45.46% vs DJP's -78.35%.
On 10-year performance, PSCF leads with 7.53% vs 6.43% for DJP. On fees, PSCF is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PSCF has been the lower-risk option at 4.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PSCF has performed better with a 7.53% return vs 6.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSCF is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for DJP.
PSCF has the higher dividend yield at 2.17%, compared with 0.00% for DJP.
PSCF is categorized as Financials Equities, while DJP is Commodities. PSCF tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Financials Index, while DJP tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Barclays Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCF and 0.70% for DJP.
DJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSCF and DJP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer