PSCE vs. POW
PSCE (Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSCE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Energy Index, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. PSCE is passively managed, while POW is actively managed. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PSCE charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.
Performance
PSCE vs. POW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCE achieves a 34.58% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 38.93% return.
PSCE
- 1D
- 2.46%
- 1M
- -4.47%
- 6M
- 27.92%
- YTD
- 34.58%
- 1Y
- 40.84%
- 3Y*
- 7.46%
- 5Y*
- 11.73%
- 10Y*
- -2.24%
POW
- 1D
- -3.60%
- 1M
- -8.76%
- 6M
- 31.71%
- YTD
- 38.93%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSCE vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PSCE Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF | 34.58% | 0.64% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 38.93% | -1.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCE and POW is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCE vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank
PSCE
POW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PSCE vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF (PSCE) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSCE | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.03 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSCE vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCE drawdown since its inception was -96.21%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -18.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCE and POW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCE | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.21% | -18.37% | -77.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.09% | -18.37% | -57.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.93% | -4.33% | -54.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.13% | — | — |
Volatility
PSCE vs. POW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCE | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.56% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.72% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.53% | 32.94% | -5.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.27% | 32.94% | +4.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.05% | 32.94% | +10.11% |
PSCE vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSCE vs. POW - Dividend Comparison
PSCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 0.14% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSCE Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF | 2.24% | 2.39% | 1.70% | 2.57% | 1.70% | 0.46% | 0.87% | 0.14% | 0.22% | 0.04% | 0.22% | 0.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCE and POW have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PSCE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PSCE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.
PSCE has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 0.14% for POW.
PSCE is categorized as Energy Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCE and 0.75% for POW.
Find the right allocation for PSCE and POW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer