PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSCD vs. XRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSCD vs. XRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary ETF (PSCD) and SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSCD achieves a 4.11% return, which is significantly higher than XRT's -1.99% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCD has outperformed XRT with an annualized return of 9.80%, while XRT has yielded a comparatively lower 8.56% annualized return.


PSCD

1D
-0.54%
1M
3.79%
YTD
4.11%
6M
2.55%
1Y
10.62%
3Y*
8.90%
5Y*
-0.65%
10Y*
9.80%

XRT

1D
-0.39%
1M
-0.29%
YTD
-1.99%
6M
-2.00%
1Y
8.44%
3Y*
13.38%
5Y*
-0.84%
10Y*
8.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSCD vs. XRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSCD
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary ETF
4.11%-2.87%6.46%33.23%-28.06%37.34%29.07%17.49%-9.28%18.16%
XRT
SPDR S&P Retail ETF
-1.99%8.07%11.78%21.53%-31.64%42.60%41.91%14.12%-8.04%4.22%

Correlation

The correlation between PSCD and XRT is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2010

0.88

The correlation between PSCD and XRT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

PSCD vs. XRT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSCD
XRT

Consumer Cyclical

87.7%
73.6%

Consumer Defensive

7.9%
20.9%

Industrials

2.1%

-

Technology

1.6%
1.4%

Real Estate

0.6%

-

Communication Services

0.2%
1.4%

Basic Materials

-

-

Energy

-

1.4%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

1.4%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

PSCD
87.7%
XRT
73.6%

Consumer Defensive

PSCD
7.9%
XRT
20.9%

Industrials

PSCD
2.1%
XRT

-

Technology

PSCD
1.6%
XRT
1.4%

Real Estate

PSCD
0.6%
XRT

-

Communication Services

PSCD
0.2%
XRT
1.4%

Basic Materials

PSCD

-

XRT

-

Energy

PSCD

-

XRT
1.4%

Financial Services

PSCD

-

XRT

-

Healthcare

PSCD

-

XRT
1.4%

Utilities

PSCD

-

XRT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSCD vs. XRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSCD
PSCD Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
PSCD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCD Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCD Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

XRT
XRT Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
XRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRT Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
XRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRT Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSCD vs. XRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary ETF (PSCD) and SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSCDXRTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.44

0.42

+0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.82

0.76

+0.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.08

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.62

0.63

0.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.54

1.45

+0.10

PSCD vs. XRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSCD Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is comparable to the XRT Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSCD and XRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSCDXRTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

0.42

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

-0.03

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.32

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.35

+0.05

Drawdowns

PSCD vs. XRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCD drawdown since its inception was -56.57%, smaller than the maximum XRT drawdown of -65.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCD and XRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSCDXRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.57%

-65.81%

+9.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.14%

-13.53%

-3.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.93%

-25.62%

-6.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.88%

-44.57%

+2.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.57%

-47.02%

-9.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.85%

-13.82%

+5.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.33%

-15.00%

+3.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.90%

5.85%

+1.05%

Volatility

PSCD vs. XRT - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary ETF (PSCD) has a higher volatility of 7.62% compared to SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) at 6.50%. This indicates that PSCD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSCDXRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.62%

6.50%

+1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.31%

13.63%

+2.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.18%

20.42%

+3.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.91%

26.90%

+1.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.06%

27.16%

+1.90%

PSCD vs. XRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSCD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than XRT's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSCD vs. XRT - Dividend Comparison

PSCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, more than XRT's 0.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSCD
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary ETF
0.91%0.94%1.28%1.09%1.60%0.57%0.56%0.91%1.39%0.97%1.07%1.10%
XRT
SPDR S&P Retail ETF
0.83%0.77%1.52%1.40%2.15%1.55%1.01%1.57%1.51%1.52%1.36%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, PSCD and XRT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PSCD has higher volatility (7.62%) compared to XRT (6.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCD dropped -56.57% vs XRT's -65.81%.

On 10-year performance, PSCD leads with 9.80% vs 8.56% for XRT. On fees, PSCD is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, XRT has been the lower-risk option at 6.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PSCD has performed better with a 9.80% return vs 8.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSCD is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XRT.

PSCD has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.83% for XRT.

PSCD tracks S&P Small Cap 600 / Consumer Discretionary -SEC, while XRT tracks S&P Retail Select Industry. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCD and 0.35% for XRT.

PSCD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSCD and XRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer