PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSCD vs. QQQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSCD vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary ETF (PSCD) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSCD achieves a 4.11% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 21.39% return.


PSCD

1D
-0.54%
1M
3.79%
YTD
4.11%
6M
2.55%
1Y
10.62%
3Y*
8.90%
5Y*
-0.65%
10Y*
9.80%

QQQM

1D
-0.20%
1M
10.67%
YTD
21.39%
6M
19.75%
1Y
41.98%
3Y*
28.89%
5Y*
18.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSCD vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PSCD
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary ETF
4.11%-2.87%6.46%33.23%-28.06%37.34%16.28%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
21.39%20.85%25.68%55.01%-32.52%27.45%6.67%

Correlation

The correlation between PSCD and QQQM is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020

0.54

The correlation between PSCD and QQQM shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PSCD vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSCD
QQQM

Consumer Cyclical

87.7%
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

7.9%
7.7%

Industrials

2.1%
2.8%

Technology

1.6%
53.8%

Real Estate

0.6%
0.1%

Communication Services

0.2%
15.8%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Energy

-

0.6%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

PSCD
87.7%
QQQM
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

PSCD
7.9%
QQQM
7.7%

Industrials

PSCD
2.1%
QQQM
2.8%

Technology

PSCD
1.6%
QQQM
53.8%

Real Estate

PSCD
0.6%
QQQM
0.1%

Communication Services

PSCD
0.2%
QQQM
15.8%

Basic Materials

PSCD

-

QQQM
1.1%

Energy

PSCD

-

QQQM
0.6%

Financial Services

PSCD

-

QQQM
0.2%

Healthcare

PSCD

-

QQQM
4.2%

Utilities

PSCD

-

QQQM
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSCD vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSCD
PSCD Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
PSCD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCD Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCD Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSCD vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary ETF (PSCD) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSCDQQQMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.44

2.65

-2.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.82

3.46

-2.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.45

-0.36

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.62

3.53

-2.90

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.54

13.52

-11.98

PSCD vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSCD Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSCD and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSCDQQQMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

2.65

-2.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

0.82

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.85

-0.46

Drawdowns

PSCD vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCD drawdown since its inception was -56.57%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCD and QQQM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSCDQQQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.57%

-35.04%

-21.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.14%

-11.96%

-5.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.93%

-22.70%

-9.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.88%

-35.04%

-6.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.85%

-0.20%

-7.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.33%

-8.25%

-3.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.90%

3.11%

+3.79%

Volatility

PSCD vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary ETF (PSCD) has a higher volatility of 7.62% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 4.48%. This indicates that PSCD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSCDQQQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.62%

4.48%

+3.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.31%

12.05%

+4.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.18%

15.91%

+8.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.91%

22.24%

+5.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.06%

22.12%

+6.94%

PSCD vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSCD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSCD vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

PSCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, more than QQQM's 0.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSCD
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary ETF
0.91%0.94%1.28%1.09%1.60%0.57%0.56%0.91%1.39%0.97%1.07%1.10%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.41%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSCD and QQQM have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSCD has higher volatility (7.62%) compared to QQQM (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCD dropped -56.57% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 18.07% vs -0.65% for PSCD. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QQQM has been the lower-risk option at 4.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 18.07% return vs -0.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PSCD.

PSCD has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.41% for QQQM.

PSCD is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. PSCD tracks S&P Small Cap 600 / Consumer Discretionary -SEC, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCD and 0.15% for QQQM.

QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSCD and QQQM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer