PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSCD vs. PEZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSCD vs. PEZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary ETF (PSCD) and Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSCD achieves a 13.01% return, which is significantly higher than PEZ's -1.42% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCD has outperformed PEZ with an annualized return of 10.31%, while PEZ has yielded a comparatively lower 9.57% annualized return.


PSCD

1D
-1.01%
1M
-0.20%
6M
8.46%
YTD
13.01%
1Y
19.09%
3Y*
8.35%
5Y*
2.08%
10Y*
10.31%
ALL TIME*
10.81%

PEZ

1D
0.17%
1M
0.32%
6M
-0.38%
YTD
-1.42%
1Y
4.90%
3Y*
11.93%
5Y*
3.14%
10Y*
9.57%
ALL TIME*
7.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$60.43K$108.59K$64.29K
$37.38K$43.87K$67.57K

PSCD vs. PEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSCD
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary ETF
13.01%-2.87%6.46%33.23%-28.06%37.34%29.07%17.49%-9.28%18.16%
PEZ
Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF
-1.42%5.40%20.06%29.55%-29.59%20.35%38.97%18.05%-6.85%19.87%

Correlation

The correlation between PSCD and PEZ is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2010

0.78

The correlation between PSCD and PEZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

PSCD vs. PEZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSCD
PEZ

Consumer Cyclical

83.9%
70.1%

Consumer Defensive

8.3%
4.4%

Industrials

4.5%
1.0%

Technology

1.4%
3.7%

Healthcare

1.2%
7.3%

Real Estate

0.7%
1.9%

Communication Services

0.2%
11.7%

Basic Materials

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.6%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

PSCD
83.9%
PEZ
70.1%

Consumer Defensive

PSCD
8.3%
PEZ
4.4%

Industrials

PSCD
4.5%
PEZ
1.0%

Technology

PSCD
1.4%
PEZ
3.7%

Healthcare

PSCD
1.2%
PEZ
7.3%

Real Estate

PSCD
0.7%
PEZ
1.9%

Communication Services

PSCD
0.2%
PEZ
11.7%

Basic Materials

PSCD

-

PEZ

-

Energy

PSCD

-

PEZ

-

Financial Services

PSCD

-

PEZ
0.6%

Utilities

PSCD

-

PEZ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSCD vs. PEZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PSCD
PSCD Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
PSCD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCD Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCD Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

PEZ
PEZ Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
PEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
PEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PSCD vs. PEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary ETF (PSCD) and Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PSCDPEZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.04

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.07

0.19

+0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.67

0.46

+2.21

PSCD vs. PEZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSCD Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is higher than the PEZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSCD and PEZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PSCD vs. PEZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCD drawdown since its inception was -56.57%, roughly equal to the maximum PEZ drawdown of -58.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCD and PEZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSCDPEZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.57%

-58.39%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.14%

-15.83%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.93%

-31.48%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.03%

-41.72%

+1.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.57%

-52.05%

-4.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.41%

-8.64%

+5.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.25%

-13.82%

+2.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.87%

6.66%

+0.21%

Volatility

PSCD vs. PEZ - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary ETF (PSCD) has a higher volatility of 6.09% compared to Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) at 4.24%. This indicates that PSCD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PEZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSCDPEZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.09%

4.24%

+1.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.85%

14.72%

+2.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.13%

20.09%

+4.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.66%

24.14%

+3.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.10%

25.06%

+4.04%

PSCD vs. PEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSCD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than PEZ's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSCD vs. PEZ - Dividend Comparison

PSCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than PEZ's 0.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PEZ
Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF
0.24%0.11%0.12%0.60%0.43%0.23%0.39%0.01%0.40%0.42%0.83%0.64%
PSCD
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary ETF
0.99%0.94%1.28%1.09%1.60%0.57%0.56%0.91%1.39%0.97%1.07%1.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSCD and PEZ have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSCD has higher volatility (6.09%) compared to PEZ (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCD dropped -56.57% vs PEZ's -58.39%.

On 10-year performance, PSCD leads with 10.31% vs 9.57% for PEZ. On fees, PSCD is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PEZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PSCD has performed better with a 10.31% return vs 9.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSCD is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PEZ.

PSCD has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.24% for PEZ.

PSCD is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while PEZ is Momentum. PSCD tracks S&P Small Cap 600 / Consumer Discretionary -SEC, while PEZ tracks DWA Consumer Cyclicals Technical Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCD and 0.60% for PEZ.

PSCD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSCD and PEZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer