PSCC vs. XLV
PSCC (Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF) and XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSCC is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples, while XLV is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Health Care Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSCC returned 6.30%/yr vs 9.61%/yr for XLV. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PSCC charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLV.
Performance
PSCC vs. XLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCC achieves a 7.16% return, which is significantly higher than XLV's -0.75% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCC has underperformed XLV with an annualized return of 6.30%, while XLV has yielded a comparatively higher 9.61% annualized return.
PSCC
- 1D
- 1.46%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 7.16%
- 6M
- 6.18%
- 1Y
- -2.82%
- 3Y*
- -1.02%
- 5Y*
- -0.20%
- 10Y*
- 6.30%
XLV
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 6.63%
- YTD
- -0.75%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- 15.89%
- 3Y*
- 7.44%
- 5Y*
- 6.32%
- 10Y*
- 9.61%
PSCC vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 7.16% | -16.47% | 0.98% | 14.83% | -6.66% | 28.82% | 11.17% | 17.39% | -6.72% | 9.72% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | -0.75% | 14.50% | 2.47% | 2.07% | -2.08% | 26.04% | 13.30% | 20.45% | 6.28% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCC and XLV is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2010 | 0.49 |
PSCC vs. XLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSCC
XLV
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
PSCC
XLV
-
Basic Materials
PSCC
XLV
-
Industrials
PSCC
XLV
-
Consumer Cyclical
PSCC
XLV
-
Communication Services
PSCC
-
XLV
-
Energy
PSCC
-
XLV
-
Financial Services
PSCC
-
XLV
-
Healthcare
PSCC
-
XLV
Real Estate
PSCC
-
XLV
-
Technology
PSCC
-
XLV
-
Utilities
PSCC
-
XLV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCC vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank
PSCC
XLV
PSCC vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSCC | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.20 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | 1.63 | -1.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.22 | 3.92 | -4.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSCC | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 | 1.14 | -1.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 0.43 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | 0.58 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.46 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
PSCC vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCC drawdown since its inception was -33.61%, smaller than the maximum XLV drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCC and XLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCC | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.61% | -39.17% | +5.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.17% | -10.47% | -4.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.36% | -17.11% | -6.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.36% | -17.11% | -6.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.61% | -28.40% | -5.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.33% | -4.10% | -12.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.98% | -7.12% | +1.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.68% | 4.34% | +4.34% |
Volatility
PSCC vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) is 4.71%, while State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) has a volatility of 5.05%. This indicates that PSCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCC | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | 5.05% | -0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.80% | 10.68% | +0.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.50% | 14.98% | +1.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.24% | 14.75% | +3.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.29% | 16.57% | +2.72% |
PSCC vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCC has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than XLV's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSCC vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison
PSCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, more than XLV's 1.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 2.08% | 2.35% | 1.88% | 1.49% | 1.29% | 1.21% | 1.59% | 1.77% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.48% | 1.34% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.64% | 1.60% | 1.67% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 2.17% | 1.57% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCC and XLV have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLV has higher volatility (5.05%) compared to PSCC (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCC dropped -33.61% vs XLV's -39.17%.
On 10-year performance, XLV leads with 9.61% vs 6.30% for PSCC. On fees, XLV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, PSCC has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLV has performed better with a 9.61% return vs 6.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PSCC.
PSCC has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 1.64% for XLV.
PSCC is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while XLV is Health & Biotech Equities. PSCC tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples, while XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCC and 0.08% for XLV.
XLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSCC and XLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer