PSCC vs. XLP
PSCC (Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF) and XLP (State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - PSCC tracks the S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples while XLP tracks the Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSCC returned 6.95%/yr vs 7.51%/yr for XLP. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSCC charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLP.
Performance
PSCC vs. XLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCC achieves a 13.60% return, which is significantly higher than XLP's 9.13% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCC has underperformed XLP with an annualized return of 6.95%, while XLP has yielded a comparatively higher 7.51% annualized return.
PSCC
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- 6.59%
- YTD
- 13.60%
- 6M
- 11.94%
- 1Y
- 5.58%
- 3Y*
- 1.06%
- 5Y*
- 1.40%
- 10Y*
- 6.95%
XLP
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- -0.59%
- YTD
- 9.13%
- 6M
- 9.37%
- 1Y
- 5.70%
- 3Y*
- 7.18%
- 5Y*
- 6.68%
- 10Y*
- 7.51%
PSCC vs. XLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 13.60% | -16.47% | 0.98% | 14.83% | -6.66% | 28.82% | 11.17% | 17.39% | -6.72% | 9.72% |
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 9.13% | 1.52% | 12.20% | -0.82% | -0.81% | 17.20% | 10.11% | 27.43% | -8.07% | 12.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCC and XLP is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2010 | 0.58 |
The correlation between PSCC and XLP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
PSCC vs. XLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSCC
XLP
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
PSCC
XLP
Basic Materials
PSCC
XLP
-
Consumer Cyclical
PSCC
XLP
Industrials
PSCC
XLP
-
Financial Services
PSCC
XLP
-
Communication Services
PSCC
-
XLP
-
Energy
PSCC
-
XLP
-
Healthcare
PSCC
-
XLP
-
Real Estate
PSCC
-
XLP
-
Technology
PSCC
-
XLP
-
Utilities
PSCC
-
XLP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCC vs. XLP — Risk / Return Rank
PSCC
XLP
PSCC vs. XLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSCC | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.08 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | 0.59 | -0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.64 | 1.12 | -0.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSCC vs. XLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCC drawdown since its inception was -33.61%, smaller than the maximum XLP drawdown of -35.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCC and XLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCC | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.61% | -35.90% | +2.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.17% | -9.69% | -5.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.36% | -12.39% | -10.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.36% | -16.30% | -7.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.61% | -24.51% | -9.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.31% | -5.82% | -5.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.99% | -7.06% | +1.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.69% | 5.09% | +3.60% |
Volatility
PSCC vs. XLP - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) has a higher volatility of 5.66% compared to State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) at 5.13%. This indicates that PSCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCC | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.66% | 5.13% | +0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.53% | 10.52% | +1.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.90% | 13.13% | +3.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.30% | 13.36% | +4.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.33% | 14.77% | +4.56% |
PSCC vs. XLP - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCC has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than XLP's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSCC vs. XLP - Dividend Comparison
PSCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than XLP's 2.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 1.72% | 2.35% | 1.88% | 1.49% | 1.29% | 1.21% | 1.59% | 1.77% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.48% | 1.34% |
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.62% | 2.75% | 2.77% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 2.28% | 2.50% | 2.57% | 3.04% | 2.62% | 2.53% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCC and XLP have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSCC has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to XLP (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCC dropped -33.61% vs XLP's -35.90%.
On 10-year performance, XLP leads with 7.51% vs 6.95% for PSCC. On fees, XLP is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLP has been the lower-risk option at 5.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLP has performed better with a 7.51% return vs 6.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLP is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PSCC.
XLP has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 1.72% for PSCC.
PSCC tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples, while XLP tracks Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCC and 0.08% for XLP.
XLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSCC and XLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer