PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSCC vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSCC vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSCC achieves a 7.16% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 38.79% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCC has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 6.30%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 42.84% annualized return.


PSCC

1D
1.46%
1M
0.51%
YTD
7.16%
6M
6.18%
1Y
-2.82%
3Y*
-1.02%
5Y*
-0.20%
10Y*
6.30%

TQQQ

1D
-14.28%
1M
-4.23%
YTD
38.79%
6M
30.51%
1Y
98.25%
3Y*
60.11%
5Y*
24.09%
10Y*
42.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSCC vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSCC
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF
7.16%-16.47%0.98%14.83%-6.66%28.82%11.17%17.39%-6.72%9.72%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
38.79%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between PSCC and TQQQ is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2010

0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between PSCC and TQQQ has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PSCC vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSCC
TQQQ

Consumer Defensive

90.4%
7.7%

Basic Materials

3.8%
1.1%

Industrials

3.0%
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

2.9%
12.3%

Communication Services

-

15.8%

Energy

-

0.6%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Technology

-

53.8%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Consumer Defensive

PSCC
90.4%
TQQQ
7.7%

Basic Materials

PSCC
3.8%
TQQQ
1.1%

Industrials

PSCC
3.0%
TQQQ
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

PSCC
2.9%
TQQQ
12.3%

Communication Services

PSCC

-

TQQQ
15.8%

Energy

PSCC

-

TQQQ
0.6%

Financial Services

PSCC

-

TQQQ
0.2%

Healthcare

PSCC

-

TQQQ
4.2%

Real Estate

PSCC

-

TQQQ
0.1%

Technology

PSCC

-

TQQQ
53.8%

Utilities

PSCC

-

TQQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSCC vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSCC
PSCC Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
PSCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCC Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCC Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSCC vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSCCTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.33

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.13

2.83

-2.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.22

9.20

-9.42

PSCC vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSCC Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSCC and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSCCTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

2.10

-2.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

0.36

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.65

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.71

-0.15

Drawdowns

PSCC vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCC drawdown since its inception was -33.61%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCC and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSCCTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.61%

-81.66%

+48.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.17%

-36.97%

+21.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.36%

-58.04%

+34.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.36%

-81.66%

+58.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.61%

-81.66%

+48.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.33%

-16.25%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.98%

-18.52%

+12.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.68%

11.33%

-2.65%

Volatility

PSCC vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) is 4.71%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 20.42%. This indicates that PSCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSCCTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.71%

20.42%

-15.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.80%

39.33%

-28.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.50%

49.81%

-33.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.24%

66.79%

-48.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.29%

66.11%

-46.82%

PSCC vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSCC has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSCC vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

PSCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, more than TQQQ's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSCC
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF
2.08%2.35%1.88%1.49%1.29%1.21%1.59%1.77%0.94%1.25%1.48%1.34%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.43%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSCC and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TQQQ has higher volatility (20.42%) compared to PSCC (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCC dropped -33.61% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 42.84% vs 6.30% for PSCC. On fees, PSCC is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PSCC has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 42.84% return vs 6.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSCC is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.

PSCC has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 0.43% for TQQQ.

PSCC is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. PSCC tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples, while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCC and 0.95% for TQQQ.

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSCC and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer