PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSCC vs. SPHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSCC vs. SPHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSCC achieves a 5.02% return, which is significantly higher than SPHD's 4.38% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCC has underperformed SPHD with an annualized return of 6.15%, while SPHD has yielded a comparatively higher 7.08% annualized return.


PSCC

1D
-0.25%
1M
-2.21%
YTD
5.02%
6M
3.53%
1Y
-5.46%
3Y*
-1.89%
5Y*
-0.60%
10Y*
6.15%

SPHD

1D
-0.89%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
4.38%
6M
4.63%
1Y
8.12%
3Y*
11.42%
5Y*
5.48%
10Y*
7.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSCC vs. SPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSCC
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF
5.02%-16.47%0.98%14.83%-6.66%28.82%11.17%17.39%-6.72%9.72%
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
4.38%3.41%18.08%1.32%0.58%24.98%-9.98%20.26%-6.17%11.90%

Correlation

The correlation between PSCC and SPHD is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2012

0.60

The correlation between PSCC and SPHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

PSCC vs. SPHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSCC
SPHD

Consumer Defensive

90.4%
17.8%

Basic Materials

3.8%

-

Industrials

3.0%
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

2.9%
3.4%

Communication Services

-

8.6%

Energy

-

14.1%

Financial Services

-

15.6%

Healthcare

-

5.1%

Real Estate

-

20.1%

Technology

-

1.5%

Utilities

-

13.7%

Consumer Defensive

PSCC
90.4%
SPHD
17.8%

Basic Materials

PSCC
3.8%
SPHD

-

Industrials

PSCC
3.0%
SPHD
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

PSCC
2.9%
SPHD
3.4%

Communication Services

PSCC

-

SPHD
8.6%

Energy

PSCC

-

SPHD
14.1%

Financial Services

PSCC

-

SPHD
15.6%

Healthcare

PSCC

-

SPHD
5.1%

Real Estate

PSCC

-

SPHD
20.1%

Technology

PSCC

-

SPHD
1.5%

Utilities

PSCC

-

SPHD
13.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSCC vs. SPHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSCC
PSCC Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
PSCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCC Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCC Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHD
SPHD Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
SPHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHD Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHD Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSCC vs. SPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSCCSPHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.13

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.36

1.11

-1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.63

2.78

-3.41

PSCC vs. SPHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSCC Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the SPHD Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSCC and SPHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSCCSPHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.33

0.74

-1.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

0.39

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.40

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.58

-0.03

Drawdowns

PSCC vs. SPHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCC drawdown since its inception was -33.61%, smaller than the maximum SPHD drawdown of -41.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCC and SPHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSCCSPHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.61%

-41.39%

+7.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.17%

-7.33%

-7.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.36%

-13.29%

-10.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.36%

-19.50%

-3.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.61%

-41.39%

+7.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.00%

-5.37%

-12.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.97%

-4.70%

-1.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.68%

2.93%

+5.75%

Volatility

PSCC vs. SPHD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) has a higher volatility of 4.46% compared to Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) at 2.99%. This indicates that PSCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSCCSPHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.46%

2.99%

+1.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.73%

7.55%

+3.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.47%

11.04%

+5.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.24%

14.16%

+4.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.29%

17.64%

+1.65%

PSCC vs. SPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSCC has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than SPHD's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSCC vs. SPHD - Dividend Comparison

PSCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than SPHD's 4.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSCC
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF
2.12%2.35%1.88%1.49%1.29%1.21%1.59%1.77%0.94%1.25%1.48%1.34%
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
4.62%4.02%3.41%4.48%3.89%3.45%4.89%4.07%4.40%3.14%3.83%3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSCC and SPHD have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSCC has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to SPHD (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCC dropped -33.61% vs SPHD's -41.39%.

On 10-year performance, SPHD leads with 7.08% vs 6.15% for PSCC. On fees, PSCC is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, SPHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPHD has performed better with a 7.08% return vs 6.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSCC is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SPHD.

SPHD has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 2.12% for PSCC.

PSCC is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while SPHD is Dividend. PSCC tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples, while SPHD tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCC and 0.30% for SPHD.

SPHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSCC and SPHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer