PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSCC vs. PRN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSCC vs. PRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) and Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSCC achieves a 13.60% return, which is significantly lower than PRN's 45.08% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCC has underperformed PRN with an annualized return of 6.95%, while PRN has yielded a comparatively higher 19.03% annualized return.


PSCC

1D
2.48%
1M
6.59%
YTD
13.60%
6M
11.94%
1Y
5.58%
3Y*
1.06%
5Y*
1.40%
10Y*
6.95%

PRN

1D
-3.57%
1M
6.97%
YTD
45.08%
6M
39.29%
1Y
65.87%
3Y*
36.27%
5Y*
20.84%
10Y*
19.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSCC vs. PRN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSCC
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF
13.60%-16.47%0.98%14.83%-6.66%28.82%11.17%17.39%-6.72%9.72%
PRN
Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF
45.08%13.74%30.35%37.96%-25.09%25.21%36.39%34.52%-16.19%22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between PSCC and PRN is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2010

0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between PSCC and PRN has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PSCC vs. PRN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSCC
PRN

Consumer Defensive

90.7%

-

Basic Materials

3.6%
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

2.9%
1.2%

Industrials

2.8%
78.2%

Financial Services

0.2%
0.1%

Communication Services

-

-

Energy

-

1.6%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

20.4%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Defensive

PSCC
90.7%
PRN

-

Basic Materials

PSCC
3.6%
PRN
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

PSCC
2.9%
PRN
1.2%

Industrials

PSCC
2.8%
PRN
78.2%

Financial Services

PSCC
0.2%
PRN
0.1%

Communication Services

PSCC

-

PRN

-

Energy

PSCC

-

PRN
1.6%

Healthcare

PSCC

-

PRN

-

Real Estate

PSCC

-

PRN

-

Technology

PSCC

-

PRN
20.4%

Utilities

PSCC

-

PRN

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSCC vs. PRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSCC
PSCC Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
PSCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCC Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCC Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

PRN
PRN Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
PRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRN Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
PRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRN Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSCC vs. PRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) and Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PSCCPRNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.35

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

4.68

-4.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.64

15.34

-14.70

PSCC vs. PRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSCC Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the PRN Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSCC and PRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PSCC vs. PRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCC drawdown since its inception was -33.61%, smaller than the maximum PRN drawdown of -59.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCC and PRN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSCCPRNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.61%

-59.88%

+26.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.17%

-14.15%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.36%

-30.78%

+7.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.36%

-34.84%

+11.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.61%

-36.27%

+2.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.31%

-3.57%

-7.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.99%

-10.82%

+4.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.69%

4.31%

+4.38%

Volatility

PSCC vs. PRN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) is 5.66%, while Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) has a volatility of 12.02%. This indicates that PSCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSCCPRNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.66%

12.02%

-6.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.53%

24.35%

-12.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.90%

30.47%

-13.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.30%

25.41%

-7.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.33%

24.38%

-5.05%

PSCC vs. PRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSCC has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than PRN's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSCC vs. PRN - Dividend Comparison

PSCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, more than PRN's 0.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRN
Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF
0.08%0.17%0.39%0.52%0.82%0.11%0.10%0.42%0.29%0.60%0.57%0.44%
PSCC
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF
1.72%2.35%1.88%1.49%1.29%1.21%1.59%1.77%0.94%1.25%1.48%1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSCC and PRN have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRN has higher volatility (12.02%) compared to PSCC (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCC dropped -33.61% vs PRN's -59.88%.

On 10-year performance, PRN leads with 19.03% vs 6.95% for PSCC. On fees, PSCC is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PSCC has been the lower-risk option at 5.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PRN has performed better with a 19.03% return vs 6.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSCC is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PRN.

PSCC has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 0.08% for PRN.

PSCC is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while PRN is Momentum. PSCC tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples, while PRN tracks DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCC and 0.60% for PRN.

PRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSCC and PRN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer