PSCC vs. PRN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PSCC (Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF) and PRN (Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSCC is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples, while PRN is a Momentum fund tracking the DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSCC returned 6.15%/yr vs 18.51%/yr for PRN. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSCC charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PRN.

Performance

PSCC vs. PRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) and Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSCC achieves a 5.02% return, which is significantly lower than PRN's 41.80% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCC has underperformed PRN with an annualized return of 6.15%, while PRN has yielded a comparatively higher 18.51% annualized return.

PSCC

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: -2.21%
• YTD: 5.02%
• 6M: 3.53%
• 1Y: -5.46%
• 3Y*: -1.89%
• 5Y*: -0.60%
• 10Y*: 6.15%

PRN

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: 6.86%
• YTD: 41.80%
• 6M: 45.38%
• 1Y: 65.12%
• 3Y*: 36.96%
• 5Y*: 20.18%
• 10Y*: 18.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSCC vs. PRN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF	5.02%	-16.47%	0.98%	14.83%	-6.66%	28.82%	11.17%	17.39%	-6.72%	9.72%
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF	41.80%	13.74%	30.35%	37.96%	-25.09%	25.21%	36.39%	34.52%	-16.19%	22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between PSCC and PRN is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.37
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2010	0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between PSCC and PRN has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PSCC vs. PRN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PSCC	PRN
Consumer Defensive	90.4%	-
Basic Materials	3.8%	1.8%
Industrials	3.0%	79.3%
Consumer Cyclical	2.9%	1.2%
Communication Services	-	-
Energy	-	1.6%
Financial Services	-	0.1%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	19.4%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

PSCC vs. PRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSCC

PSCC Risk / Return Rank: 6
PSCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
PSCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
PSCC Omega Ratio Rank: 5
PSCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
PSCC Martin Ratio Rank: 6

PRN

PRN Risk / Return Rank: 70
PRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
PRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
PRN Omega Ratio Rank: 60
PRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
PRN Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSCC vs. PRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) and Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PSCC	PRN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.33	2.29	-2.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.37	2.86	-3.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.37	-0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.36	4.63	-4.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.63	15.45	-16.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PSCC vs. PRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSCC Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the PRN Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSCC and PRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PSCC	PRN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.33	2.29	-2.62
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.03	0.81	-0.84
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32	0.77	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.52	+0.03

Drawdowns

PSCC vs. PRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCC drawdown since its inception was -33.61%, smaller than the maximum PRN drawdown of -59.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCC and PRN.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSCC	PRN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.61%	-59.88%	+26.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.17%	-14.15%	-1.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.36%	-30.78%	+7.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.36%	-34.84%	+11.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.61%	-36.27%	+2.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.00%	-0.47%	-17.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.97%	-10.84%	+4.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.68%	4.23%	+4.45%

Volatility

PSCC vs. PRN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) is 4.46%, while Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) has a volatility of 10.95%. This indicates that PSCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSCC	PRN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.46%	10.95%	-6.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.73%	23.22%	-12.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.47%	28.66%	-12.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.24%	25.03%	-6.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.29%	24.17%	-4.88%

PSCC vs. PRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSCC has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than PRN's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSCC vs. PRN - Dividend Comparison

PSCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, more than PRN's 0.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF	0.11%	0.17%	0.39%	0.52%	0.82%	0.11%	0.10%	0.42%	0.29%	0.60%	0.57%	0.44%
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF	2.12%	2.35%	1.88%	1.49%	1.29%	1.21%	1.59%	1.77%	0.94%	1.25%	1.48%	1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSCC and PRN in my portfolio?

PSCC and PRN have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSCC or PRN?

PRN has higher volatility (10.95%) compared to PSCC (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCC dropped -33.61% vs PRN's -59.88%.

Which ETF is better, PSCC or PRN?

On 10-year performance, PRN leads with 18.51% vs 6.15% for PSCC. On fees, PSCC is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PSCC has been the lower-risk option at 4.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PSCC or PRN?

Over the 10-year period, PRN has performed better with a 18.51% return vs 6.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSCC or PRN?

PSCC is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PRN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSCC or PRN?

PSCC has the higher dividend yield at 2.12%, compared with 0.11% for PRN.

What is the main difference between PSCC and PRN?

PSCC is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while PRN is Momentum. PSCC tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples, while PRN tracks DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCC and 0.60% for PRN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.