PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSC vs. BCHP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PSC vs. BCHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF (PSC) and Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF (BCHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PSC vs. BCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PSC
Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF
-0.70%13.41%12.38%6.51%
BCHP
Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF
-12.70%10.20%20.55%12.89%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSC achieves a -0.70% return, which is significantly higher than BCHP's -12.70% return.


PSC

1D
2.99%
1M
-4.85%
YTD
-0.70%
6M
0.91%
1Y
18.90%
3Y*
13.51%
5Y*
6.49%
10Y*

BCHP

1D
3.39%
1M
-5.16%
YTD
-12.70%
6M
-13.06%
1Y
1.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PSC vs. BCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSC has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than BCHP's 0.58% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PSC vs. BCHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSC
PSC Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
PSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSC Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
PSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSC Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

BCHP
BCHP Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
BCHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCHP Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
BCHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCHP Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSC vs. BCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF (PSC) and Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF (BCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSCBCHPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.85

0.07

+0.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.32

0.25

+1.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.03

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

0.09

+1.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.81

0.31

+5.50

PSC vs. BCHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSC Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is higher than the BCHP Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSC and BCHP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSCBCHPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

0.07

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.62

-0.18

Correlation

The correlation between PSC and BCHP is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

PSC vs. BCHP - Dividend Comparison

PSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, while BCHP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PSC
Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF
0.67%0.67%0.75%0.73%1.92%1.45%1.25%1.47%1.30%0.95%0.35%
BCHP
Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF
0.00%0.00%1.02%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PSC vs. BCHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSC drawdown since its inception was -46.69%, which is greater than BCHP's maximum drawdown of -18.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSC and BCHP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PSCBCHPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.69%

-18.56%

-28.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.63%

-18.12%

+5.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.26%

-15.19%

+7.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.40%

-2.86%

-5.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

5.25%

-1.85%

Volatility

PSC vs. BCHP - Volatility Comparison

Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF (PSC) and Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF (BCHP) have volatilities of 6.85% and 6.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PSCBCHPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.85%

6.75%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.18%

12.33%

+1.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.46%

20.27%

+2.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.06%

16.83%

+4.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.40%

16.83%

+6.57%