PRZO vs. LAES
PRZO (ParaZero Technologies Ltd. Ordinary Shares) and LAES (SEALSQ Corp) are both stocks. PRZO operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while LAES operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past year, PRZO returned -49.14% vs -27.06% for LAES. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PRZO vs. LAES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRZO achieves a -26.98% return, which is significantly lower than LAES's -17.99% return.
PRZO
- 1D
- -3.06%
- 1M
- 7.50%
- YTD
- -26.98%
- 6M
- -52.77%
- 1Y
- -49.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LAES
- 1D
- -3.13%
- 1M
- 4.73%
- YTD
- -17.99%
- 6M
- -26.89%
- 1Y
- -27.06%
- 3Y*
- -33.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PRZO vs. LAES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PRZO ParaZero Technologies Ltd. Ordinary Shares | -26.98% | -59.85% | 185.59% | -82.62% |
LAES SEALSQ Corp | -17.99% | -38.54% | 380.47% | -87.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRZO and LAES is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2023 | 0.19 |
Over the past year, PRZO and LAES have become more correlated (0.42) than their long-term average of 0.19, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
PRZO:
-$0.33
LAES:
-$0.43
PRZO:
13.95
LAES:
10.21
PRZO:
$741.37K
LAES:
$35.37M
PRZO:
-$40.47K
LAES:
$13.21M
PRZO:
-$7.24M
LAES:
-$41.81M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRZO vs. LAES — Risk / Return Rank
PRZO
LAES
PRZO vs. LAES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ParaZero Technologies Ltd. Ordinary Shares (PRZO) and SEALSQ Corp (LAES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRZO | LAES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.04 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.64 | -0.37 | -0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.16 | -0.62 | -0.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRZO vs. LAES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRZO drawdown since its inception was -88.53%, smaller than the maximum LAES drawdown of -98.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRZO and LAES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRZO | LAES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.53% | -98.44% | +9.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -76.78% | -72.68% | -4.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -98.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.45% | -85.89% | +0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.24% | -84.60% | +10.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.41% | 43.58% | -1.17% |
Volatility
PRZO vs. LAES - Volatility Comparison
ParaZero Technologies Ltd. Ordinary Shares (PRZO) has a higher volatility of 50.24% compared to SEALSQ Corp (LAES) at 28.38%. This indicates that PRZO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LAES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRZO | LAES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 50.24% | 28.38% | +21.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 91.31% | 66.23% | +25.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 117.45% | 109.13% | +8.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 174.37% | 170.29% | +4.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 174.37% | 170.29% | +4.08% |
Dividends
PRZO vs. LAES - Dividend Comparison
Neither PRZO nor LAES has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
PRZO vs. LAES - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ParaZero Technologies Ltd. Ordinary Shares and SEALSQ Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PRZO and LAES have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRZO has higher volatility (50.24%) compared to LAES (28.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRZO dropped -88.53% vs LAES's -98.44%.
LAES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.25 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRZO and LAES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer