PRXV vs. PY
PRXV (Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF) and PY (Principal Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PRXV charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for PY.
Performance
PRXV vs. PY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PRXV
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 3.16%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PY
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 2.11%
- 6M
- 4.75%
- YTD
- 6.52%
- 1Y
- 11.90%
- 3Y*
- 12.50%
- 5Y*
- 8.18%
- 10Y*
- 11.08%
PRXV vs. PY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PRXV Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF | 8.29% |
PY Principal Value ETF | 3.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRXV and PY is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2026 | 0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRXV vs. PY — Risk / Return Rank
PRXV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PY
PRXV vs. PY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV) and Principal Value ETF (PY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRXV | PY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.19 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.81 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.00 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRXV vs. PY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRXV drawdown since its inception was -1.41%, smaller than the maximum PY drawdown of -45.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRXV and PY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRXV | PY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.41% | -45.44% | +44.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.02% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.38% | -5.01% | +4.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.87% | — |
Volatility
PRXV vs. PY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRXV | PY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.87% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.41% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.18% | 10.49% | -0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.18% | 15.68% | -5.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.18% | 20.07% | -9.89% |
PRXV vs. PY - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRXV has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than PY's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRXV vs. PY - Dividend Comparison
PRXV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than PY's 1.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRXV Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PY Principal Value ETF | 1.95% | 2.14% | 2.22% | 2.68% | 3.02% | 2.83% | 2.95% | 2.25% | 2.34% | 1.68% | 1.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRXV and PY have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for PRXV.
PY has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 0.38% for PRXV.
They also come from different issuers: Praxis and Principal. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for PRXV and 0.15% for PY.
Find the right allocation for PRXV and PY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer