PRXG vs. BPH

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PRXG (Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF) and BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PRXG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Praxis, while BPH is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Precidian. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. PRXG charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BPH.

Performance

PRXG vs. BPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF (PRXG) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PRXG

• 1D: -1.82%
• 1M: -3.70%
• YTD: 4.11%
• 6M: 2.94%
• 1Y: 20.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BPH

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRXG vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
PRXG Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF	-3.70%
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	-5.53%

Correlation

The correlation between PRXG and BPH is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026	-0.10

Return for Risk

PRXG vs. BPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRXG

PRXG Risk / Return Rank: 34
PRXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
PRXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
PRXG Omega Ratio Rank: 35
PRXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
PRXG Martin Ratio Rank: 33

BPH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRXG vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF (PRXG) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PRXG	BPH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.70	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.29	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.48	—	—

Drawdowns

PRXG vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRXG drawdown since its inception was -15.91%, which is greater than BPH's maximum drawdown of -9.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRXG and BPH.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRXG	BPH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.91%	-9.43%	-6.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.51%	-8.71%	+2.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.72%	-3.18%	+0.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.58%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PRXG	BPH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.65%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.36%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.86%	24.10%	-7.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.69%	24.10%	-2.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.69%	24.10%	-2.41%

PRXG vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRXG has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRXG vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison

PRXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than BPH's 0.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	0.53%	0.00%
PRXG Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF	0.11%	0.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRXG and BPH in my portfolio?

PRXG and BPH have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PRXG or BPH?

On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PRXG or BPH?

BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for PRXG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PRXG or BPH?

BPH has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.11% for PRXG.

What is the main difference between PRXG and BPH?

PRXG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BPH is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Praxis and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for PRXG and 0.19% for BPH.