PRXG vs. AINP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PRXG (Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF) and AINP (Allspring Income Plus ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PRXG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Praxis, while AINP is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Allspring. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PRXG returned 27.99% vs 6.37% for AINP. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.36% expense ratio.

Performance

PRXG vs. AINP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF (PRXG) and Allspring Income Plus ETF (AINP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRXG achieves a 9.82% return, which is significantly higher than AINP's 1.11% return.

PRXG

• 1D: -1.09%
• 1M: 6.16%
• YTD: 9.82%
• 6M: 8.96%
• 1Y: 27.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AINP

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 0.72%
• YTD: 1.11%
• 6M: 1.44%
• 1Y: 6.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRXG vs. AINP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PRXG Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF	9.82%	48.09%
AINP Allspring Income Plus ETF	1.11%	7.82%

Correlation

The correlation between PRXG and AINP is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2025	0.35

Return for Risk

PRXG vs. AINP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRXG

PRXG Risk / Return Rank: 46
PRXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
PRXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
PRXG Omega Ratio Rank: 50
PRXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
PRXG Martin Ratio Rank: 41

AINP

AINP Risk / Return Rank: 60
AINP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
AINP Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
AINP Omega Ratio Rank: 64
AINP Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
AINP Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRXG vs. AINP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF (PRXG) and Allspring Income Plus ETF (AINP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PRXG	AINP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.77	1.96	-0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	2.97	-0.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.39	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.77	2.55	-0.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.32	10.47	-4.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PRXG vs. AINP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRXG Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the AINP Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRXG and AINP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PRXG	AINP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.77	1.96	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.57	1.36	+1.21

Drawdowns

PRXG vs. AINP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRXG drawdown since its inception was -15.91%, which is greater than AINP's maximum drawdown of -2.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRXG and AINP.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRXG	AINP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.91%	-2.61%	-13.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.91%	-2.51%	-13.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.37%	-0.22%	-1.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.62%	-0.47%	-2.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.44%	0.61%	+3.83%

Volatility

PRXG vs. AINP - Volatility Comparison

Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF (PRXG) has a higher volatility of 3.91% compared to Allspring Income Plus ETF (AINP) at 1.14%. This indicates that PRXG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AINP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRXG	AINP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.91%	1.14%	+2.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.15%	2.45%	+9.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.87%	3.27%	+12.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.57%	3.63%	+16.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.57%	3.63%	+16.94%

PRXG vs. AINP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PRXG and AINP have an expense ratio of 0.36%.

Dividends

PRXG vs. AINP - Dividend Comparison

PRXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than AINP's 5.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AINP Allspring Income Plus ETF	5.78%	5.03%	0.47%
PRXG Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF	0.11%	0.09%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRXG and AINP in my portfolio?

PRXG and AINP have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PRXG or AINP?

PRXG has higher volatility (3.91%) compared to AINP (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRXG dropped -15.91% vs AINP's -2.61%.

Which ETF is better, PRXG or AINP?

On 1-year performance, PRXG leads with 27.99% vs 6.37% for AINP. Both ETFs have the same 0.36% expense ratio. On volatility, AINP has been the lower-risk option at 1.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PRXG or AINP?

Over the 1-year period, PRXG has performed better with a 27.99% return vs 6.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PRXG or AINP?

PRXG and AINP have the same expense ratio: 0.36% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PRXG or AINP?

AINP has the higher dividend yield at 5.78%, compared with 0.11% for PRXG.

What is the main difference between PRXG and AINP?

PRXG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while AINP is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Praxis and Allspring.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AINP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.