PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRXG vs. AINP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRXG vs. AINP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF (PRXG) and Allspring Income Plus ETF (AINP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRXG achieves a 10.29% return, which is significantly higher than AINP's 1.52% return.


PRXG

1D
-0.16%
1M
2.72%
6M
14.72%
YTD
10.29%
1Y
20.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
38.00%

AINP

1D
-0.01%
1M
-0.21%
6M
1.08%
YTD
1.52%
1Y
4.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$81.50K$132.55K$176.58K
$227.86K$164.27K$179.26K

PRXG vs. AINP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
PRXG
Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF
10.29%38.94%
AINP
Allspring Income Plus ETF
1.52%7.20%

Correlation

The correlation between PRXG and AINP is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2025

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRXG vs. AINP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PRXG
PRXG Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
PRXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRXG Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
PRXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRXG Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

AINP
AINP Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
AINP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AINP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
AINP Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
AINP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
AINP Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PRXG vs. AINP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF (PRXG) and Allspring Income Plus ETF (AINP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRXGAINPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.25

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

1.70

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.15

6.55

-2.39

PRXG vs. AINP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRXG Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is comparable to the AINP Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRXG and AINP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRXG vs. AINP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRXG drawdown since its inception was -15.91%, which is greater than AINP's maximum drawdown of -2.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRXG and AINP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRXGAINPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.91%

-2.61%

-13.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.91%

-2.51%

-13.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.96%

-0.39%

-0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.89%

-0.47%

-2.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.88%

0.65%

+4.23%

Volatility

PRXG vs. AINP - Volatility Comparison

Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF (PRXG) has a higher volatility of 5.82% compared to Allspring Income Plus ETF (AINP) at 0.89%. This indicates that PRXG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AINP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRXGAINPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.82%

0.89%

+4.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.11%

2.63%

+11.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.56%

3.25%

+14.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.45%

3.58%

+17.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.45%

3.58%

+17.87%

PRXG vs. AINP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PRXG and AINP have an expense ratio of 0.36%.


Dividends

PRXG vs. AINP - Dividend Comparison

PRXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than AINP's 5.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AINP
Allspring Income Plus ETF
5.83%5.03%0.47%
PRXG
Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF
0.09%0.09%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRXG and AINP have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRXG has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to AINP (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRXG dropped -15.91% vs AINP's -2.61%.

On 1-year performance, PRXG leads with 20.23% vs 4.25% for AINP. Both ETFs have the same 0.36% expense ratio. On volatility, AINP has been the lower-risk option at 0.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PRXG has performed better with a 20.23% return vs 4.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PRXG and AINP have the same expense ratio: 0.36% per year.

AINP has the higher dividend yield at 5.83%, compared with 0.09% for PRXG.

PRXG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while AINP is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Praxis and Allspring.

AINP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRXG and AINP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer