PRVT vs. NASA
PRVT (Tema Listed Private Managers ETF) and NASA (Tema Space Innovators ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PRVT is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Tema, while NASA is a Aerospace & Defense fund actively managed by Tema. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.40, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
PRVT vs. NASA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PRVT
- 1D
- 2.08%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NASA
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -15.54%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PRVT vs. NASA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PRVT Tema Listed Private Managers ETF | 1.57% |
NASA Tema Space Innovators ETF | -8.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRVT and NASA is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2026 | -0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRVT vs. NASA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Listed Private Managers ETF (PRVT) and Tema Space Innovators ETF (NASA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRVT vs. NASA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRVT drawdown since its inception was -2.95%, smaller than the maximum NASA drawdown of -36.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRVT and NASA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRVT | NASA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.95% | -36.93% | +33.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.93% | -36.29% | +35.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.97% | -11.63% | +10.66% |
Volatility
PRVT vs. NASA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRVT | NASA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.67% | 67.67% | -28.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.67% | 67.67% | -28.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.67% | 67.67% | -28.00% |
PRVT vs. NASA - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PRVT and NASA have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
PRVT vs. NASA - Dividend Comparison
Neither PRVT nor NASA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PRVT and NASA have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PRVT and NASA have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
PRVT and NASA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
PRVT is categorized as Financials Equities, while NASA is Aerospace & Defense.
Find the right allocation for PRVT and NASA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer