PRVT vs. HRTS

Last updated Jul 10, 2026

PRVT (Tema Listed Private Managers ETF) and HRTS (Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PRVT is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Tema, while HRTS is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by Tema. Both are actively managed. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

PRVT vs. HRTS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tema Listed Private Managers ETF (PRVT) and Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF (HRTS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PRVT

• 1D: 2.08%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HRTS

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 8.37%
• 6M: 2.61%
• YTD: 5.17%
• 1Y: 29.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRVT vs. HRTS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
PRVT Tema Listed Private Managers ETF	1.57%
HRTS Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF	-0.42%

Correlation

The correlation between PRVT and HRTS is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2026	1.00

Return for Risk

PRVT vs. HRTS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRVT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HRTS

HRTS Risk / Return Rank: 66
HRTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
HRTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
HRTS Omega Ratio Rank: 65
HRTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
HRTS Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRVT vs. HRTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Listed Private Managers ETF (PRVT) and Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF (HRTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PRVT	HRTS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.82	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.73	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.31	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.73	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.56	—

Drawdowns

PRVT vs. HRTS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRVT drawdown since its inception was -2.95%, smaller than the maximum HRTS drawdown of -25.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRVT and HRTS.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRVT	HRTS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.95%	-25.81%	+22.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.01%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.93%	-1.21%	+0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.97%	-8.83%	+7.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.57%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PRVT	HRTS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.03%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.24%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.67%	16.58%	+23.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.67%	19.11%	+20.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.67%	19.11%	+20.56%

PRVT vs. HRTS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PRVT and HRTS have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

PRVT vs. HRTS - Dividend Comparison

PRVT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HRTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
HRTS Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF	1.27%	1.34%	1.63%
PRVT Tema Listed Private Managers ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRVT and HRTS in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, PRVT and HRTS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, PRVT or HRTS?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PRVT or HRTS?

PRVT and HRTS have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PRVT or HRTS?

HRTS has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.00% for PRVT.

What is the main difference between PRVT and HRTS?

PRVT is categorized as Financials Equities, while HRTS is Health & Biotech Equities.