PRVT vs. GSIB

Last updated Jul 30, 2026

PRVT (Tema Listed Private Managers ETF) and GSIB (Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PRVT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for GSIB.

Performance

PRVT vs. GSIB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tema Listed Private Managers ETF (PRVT) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PRVT

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

GSIB

• 1D: -1.90%
• 1M: 4.27%
• 6M: 14.65%
• YTD: 18.66%
• 1Y: 40.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 43.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	$2.35M	$1.30M	$748.99K
PRVT Tema Listed Private Managers ETF	$8.30K	$7.65K	$7.65K

PRVT vs. GSIB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
PRVT Tema Listed Private Managers ETF	6.54%
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	3.07%

Correlation

The correlation between PRVT and GSIB is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2026	0.44

PRVT vs. GSIB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PRVT	GSIB
Real Estate	100.0%	-
Financial Services	98.6%	99.3%
Basic Materials	2.0%	-
Utilities	1.1%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Technology	-	0.1%

Return for Risk

PRVT vs. GSIB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PRVT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GSIB

GSIB Risk / Return Rank: 86
GSIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
GSIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
GSIB Omega Ratio Rank: 87
GSIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
GSIB Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PRVT vs. GSIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Listed Private Managers ETF (PRVT) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PRVT	GSIB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.31	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.24	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.38	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.92	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.26	—

Drawdowns

PRVT vs. GSIB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRVT drawdown since its inception was -4.07%, smaller than the maximum GSIB drawdown of -17.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRVT and GSIB.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRVT	GSIB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.07%	-17.71%	+13.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.91%	-2.23%	+1.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.08%	-2.00%	+0.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.96%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PRVT	GSIB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.81%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.61%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.36%	17.59%	+8.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.36%	18.37%	+7.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.36%	18.37%	+7.99%

PRVT vs. GSIB - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRVT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIB's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRVT vs. GSIB - Dividend Comparison

PRVT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GSIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	1.61%	1.91%	1.67%
PRVT Tema Listed Private Managers ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRVT and GSIB in my portfolio?

PRVT and GSIB have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PRVT or GSIB?

On fees, GSIB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PRVT or GSIB?

GSIB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PRVT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PRVT or GSIB?

GSIB has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.00% for PRVT.

What is the main difference between PRVT and GSIB?

They also come from different issuers: Tema and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PRVT and 0.35% for GSIB.