PRVS vs. PRF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PRVS (Parnassus Value Select ETF) and PRF (Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. PRVS is actively managed, while PRF is passively managed. Over the past year, PRVS returned 32.25% vs 34.38% for PRF. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PRVS charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for PRF.

Performance

PRVS vs. PRF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Parnassus Value Select ETF (PRVS) and Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRVS achieves a 11.32% return, which is significantly lower than PRF's 15.65% return.

PRVS

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: 3.79%
• YTD: 11.32%
• 6M: 12.60%
• 1Y: 32.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PRF

• 1D: 0.75%
• 1M: 3.76%
• YTD: 15.65%
• 6M: 16.07%
• 1Y: 34.38%
• 3Y*: 21.84%
• 5Y*: 12.60%
• 10Y*: 13.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRVS vs. PRF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PRVS Parnassus Value Select ETF	11.32%	18.07%	-4.37%
PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF	15.65%	18.33%	-3.16%

Correlation

The correlation between PRVS and PRF is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2024	0.88

The correlation between PRVS and PRF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PRVS vs. PRF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRVS

PRVS Risk / Return Rank: 78
PRVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
PRVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
PRVS Omega Ratio Rank: 77
PRVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
PRVS Martin Ratio Rank: 83

PRF

PRF Risk / Return Rank: 91
PRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
PRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
PRF Omega Ratio Rank: 91
PRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
PRF Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRVS vs. PRF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parnassus Value Select ETF (PRVS) and Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PRVS	PRF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.51	3.25	-0.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.49	4.52	-1.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.59	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.48	5.24	-1.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.43	21.66	-5.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PRVS vs. PRF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRVS Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the PRF Sharpe Ratio of 3.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRVS and PRF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PRVS	PRF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.51	3.25	-0.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.83	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.01	0.48	+0.53

Drawdowns

PRVS vs. PRF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRVS drawdown since its inception was -17.64%, smaller than the maximum PRF drawdown of -60.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRVS and PRF.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRVS	PRF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.64%	-60.35%	+42.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.32%	-6.59%	-2.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.82%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.72%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.16%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.45%	0.00%	-0.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.68%	-6.93%	+4.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.97%	1.59%	+0.38%

Volatility

PRVS vs. PRF - Volatility Comparison

Parnassus Value Select ETF (PRVS) has a higher volatility of 3.21% compared to Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) at 2.51%. This indicates that PRVS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRVS	PRF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.21%	2.51%	+0.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.09%	7.77%	+2.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.92%	10.64%	+2.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.81%	15.19%	+1.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.81%	17.67%	-0.86%

PRVS vs. PRF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRVS has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than PRF's 0.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRVS vs. PRF - Dividend Comparison

PRVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than PRF's 1.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF	1.37%	1.59%	1.78%	1.84%	2.01%	1.58%	1.97%	1.99%	2.25%	1.58%	2.17%	2.25%
PRVS Parnassus Value Select ETF	0.54%	0.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRVS and PRF in my portfolio?

PRVS and PRF have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PRVS or PRF?

PRVS has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to PRF (2.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRVS dropped -17.64% vs PRF's -60.35%.

Which ETF is better, PRVS or PRF?

On 1-year performance, PRF leads with 34.38% vs 32.25% for PRVS. On fees, PRF is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, PRF has been the lower-risk option at 2.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PRVS or PRF?

Over the 1-year period, PRF has performed better with a 34.38% return vs 32.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PRVS or PRF?

PRF is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PRVS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PRVS or PRF?

PRF has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.54% for PRVS.

What is the main difference between PRVS and PRF?

They also come from different issuers: Parnassus and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PRVS and 0.34% for PRF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PRF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.