PRVS vs. PJFV

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

PRVS (Parnassus Value Select ETF) and PJFV (PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PRVS returned 34.20% vs 36.04% for PJFV. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PRVS charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PJFV.

Performance

PRVS vs. PJFV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Parnassus Value Select ETF (PRVS) and PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF (PJFV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRVS achieves a 11.82% return, which is significantly lower than PJFV's 14.95% return.

PRVS

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 4.18%
• YTD: 11.82%
• 6M: 13.80%
• 1Y: 34.20%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PJFV

• 1D: 0.75%
• 1M: 3.15%
• YTD: 14.95%
• 6M: 16.52%
• 1Y: 36.04%
• 3Y*: 24.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRVS vs. PJFV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PRVS Parnassus Value Select ETF	11.82%	18.07%	-4.37%
PJFV PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF	14.95%	18.65%	-2.11%

Correlation

The correlation between PRVS and PJFV is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2024	0.85

The correlation between PRVS and PJFV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PRVS vs. PJFV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRVS

PRVS Risk / Return Rank: 79
PRVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
PRVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
PRVS Omega Ratio Rank: 78
PRVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
PRVS Martin Ratio Rank: 83

PJFV

PJFV Risk / Return Rank: 87
PJFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
PJFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
PJFV Omega Ratio Rank: 86
PJFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
PJFV Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRVS vs. PJFV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parnassus Value Select ETF (PRVS) and PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF (PJFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PRVS	PJFV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.66	2.95	-0.28
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.68	4.04	-0.37
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.53	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.66	4.95	-1.29
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.32	21.25	-3.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PRVS vs. PJFV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRVS Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is comparable to the PJFV Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRVS and PJFV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PRVS	PJFV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.66	2.95	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.04	1.53	-0.50

Drawdowns

PRVS vs. PJFV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRVS drawdown since its inception was -17.64%, roughly equal to the maximum PJFV drawdown of -18.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRVS and PJFV.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRVS	PJFV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.64%	-18.15%	+0.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.32%	-7.31%	-2.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.15%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.68%	-2.12%	-0.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.97%	1.70%	+0.27%

Volatility

PRVS vs. PJFV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Parnassus Value Select ETF (PRVS) is 3.16%, while PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF (PJFV) has a volatility of 4.36%. This indicates that PRVS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PJFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRVS	PJFV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.16%	4.36%	-1.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.11%	10.07%	+0.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.91%	12.29%	+0.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.83%	14.13%	+2.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.83%	14.13%	+2.70%

PRVS vs. PJFV - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRVS has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than PJFV's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRVS vs. PJFV - Dividend Comparison

PRVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than PJFV's 0.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
PJFV PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF	0.60%	0.68%	1.31%	1.20%	0.12%
PRVS Parnassus Value Select ETF	0.54%	0.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRVS and PJFV in my portfolio?

PRVS and PJFV have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PRVS or PJFV?

PJFV has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to PRVS (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRVS dropped -17.64% vs PJFV's -18.15%.

Which ETF is better, PRVS or PJFV?

On 1-year performance, PJFV leads with 36.04% vs 34.20% for PRVS. On fees, PRVS is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, PRVS has been the lower-risk option at 3.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PRVS or PJFV?

Over the 1-year period, PJFV has performed better with a 36.04% return vs 34.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PRVS or PJFV?

PRVS is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PJFV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PRVS or PJFV?

PJFV has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.54% for PRVS.

What is the main difference between PRVS and PJFV?

They also come from different issuers: Parnassus and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PRVS and 0.75% for PJFV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PJFV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 2.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.