PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRVS vs. IVRA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRVS vs. IVRA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Parnassus Value Select ETF (PRVS) and Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF (IVRA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PRVS having a 11.32% return and IVRA slightly higher at 11.70%.


PRVS

1D
-0.45%
1M
3.79%
YTD
11.32%
6M
12.60%
1Y
32.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IVRA

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
11.70%
6M
12.41%
1Y
15.73%
3Y*
15.46%
5Y*
7.62%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRVS vs. IVRA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PRVS
Parnassus Value Select ETF
11.32%18.07%-4.37%
IVRA
Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF
11.70%10.20%-3.51%

Correlation

The correlation between PRVS and IVRA is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2024

0.46

The correlation between PRVS and IVRA shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRVS vs. IVRA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRVS
PRVS Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
PRVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRVS Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
PRVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRVS Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

IVRA
IVRA Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
IVRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVRA Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
IVRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVRA Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRVS vs. IVRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parnassus Value Select ETF (PRVS) and Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF (IVRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRVSIVRADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.36

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

3.46

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.43

12.02

+4.40

PRVS vs. IVRA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRVS Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is higher than the IVRA Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRVS and IVRA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRVSIVRADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

1.72

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

0.73

+0.28

Drawdowns

PRVS vs. IVRA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRVS drawdown since its inception was -17.64%, smaller than the maximum IVRA drawdown of -25.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRVS and IVRA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRVSIVRADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.64%

-25.99%

+8.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.32%

-4.60%

-4.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-0.92%

+0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.68%

-7.27%

+4.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

1.32%

+0.65%

Volatility

PRVS vs. IVRA - Volatility Comparison

Parnassus Value Select ETF (PRVS) has a higher volatility of 3.21% compared to Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF (IVRA) at 0.00%. This indicates that PRVS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRVSIVRADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

0.00%

+3.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.09%

5.45%

+4.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.92%

9.27%

+3.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.81%

16.58%

+0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.81%

16.39%

+0.42%

PRVS vs. IVRA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PRVS and IVRA have an expense ratio of 0.59%.


Dividends

PRVS vs. IVRA - Dividend Comparison

PRVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than IVRA's 16.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
IVRA
Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF
16.99%5.68%3.71%2.47%2.30%3.01%
PRVS
Parnassus Value Select ETF
0.54%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRVS and IVRA have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRVS has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to IVRA (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRVS dropped -17.64% vs IVRA's -25.99%.

On 1-year performance, PRVS leads with 32.25% vs 15.73% for IVRA. Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. On volatility, IVRA has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PRVS has performed better with a 32.25% return vs 15.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PRVS and IVRA have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.

IVRA has the higher dividend yield at 16.99%, compared with 0.54% for PRVS.

PRVS is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while IVRA is ESG. They also come from different issuers: Parnassus and Invesco.

PRVS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRVS and IVRA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer