PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRUAX vs. ARCC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRUAX vs. ARCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Utility Fund (PRUAX) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRUAX achieves a 1.53% return, which is significantly higher than ARCC's -5.14% return. Over the past 10 years, PRUAX has underperformed ARCC with an annualized return of 10.25%, while ARCC has yielded a comparatively higher 12.56% annualized return.


PRUAX

1D
-3.13%
1M
-7.56%
YTD
1.53%
6M
-0.75%
1Y
8.21%
3Y*
17.00%
5Y*
10.93%
10Y*
10.25%

ARCC

1D
-1.53%
1M
-2.61%
YTD
-5.14%
6M
-5.66%
1Y
-6.58%
3Y*
9.07%
5Y*
8.64%
10Y*
12.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRUAX vs. ARCC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRUAX
PGIM Jennison Utility Fund
1.53%11.47%39.83%-3.96%-0.18%14.89%4.14%27.06%1.14%13.78%
ARCC
Ares Capital Corporation
-5.14%1.07%19.78%20.03%-3.84%36.14%0.86%31.30%8.81%4.50%

Correlation

The correlation between PRUAX and ARCC is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2004

0.44

Over the past year, the correlation between PRUAX and ARCC has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRUAX vs. ARCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRUAX
PRUAX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
PRUAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRUAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRUAX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
PRUAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRUAX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

ARCC
ARCC Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
ARCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARCC Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
ARCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARCC Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRUAX vs. ARCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Utility Fund (PRUAX) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRUAXARCCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.56

-0.36

+0.92

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.84

-0.38

+1.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

0.95

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

-0.34

+1.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.34

-0.63

+2.97

PRUAX vs. ARCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRUAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is higher than the ARCC Sharpe Ratio of -0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRUAX and ARCC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRUAXARCCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

-0.36

+0.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.43

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.49

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.37

+0.28

Drawdowns

PRUAX vs. ARCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRUAX drawdown since its inception was -58.20%, smaller than the maximum ARCC drawdown of -79.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRUAX and ARCC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRUAXARCCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.20%

-79.36%

+21.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.25%

-19.35%

+10.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.92%

-19.35%

+4.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.65%

-21.76%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.54%

-56.77%

+21.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.81%

-13.66%

+4.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.43%

-9.10%

-0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.07%

10.48%

-6.41%

Volatility

PRUAX vs. ARCC - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Jennison Utility Fund (PRUAX) has a higher volatility of 5.41% compared to Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) at 3.94%. This indicates that PRUAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRUAXARCCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.41%

3.94%

+1.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.62%

14.71%

-2.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.45%

18.40%

-2.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.20%

19.96%

-2.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.89%

25.58%

-7.69%

Dividends

PRUAX vs. ARCC - Dividend Comparison

PRUAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.18%, more than ARCC's 10.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARCC
Ares Capital Corporation
10.28%9.49%8.77%9.59%10.12%7.65%9.47%9.01%9.88%9.67%9.22%11.02%
PRUAX
PGIM Jennison Utility Fund
11.18%11.24%18.59%9.82%8.33%13.94%2.07%5.62%9.19%4.19%7.64%11.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRUAX and ARCC have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRUAX has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to ARCC (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRUAX dropped -58.20% vs ARCC's -79.36%.

PRUAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.56 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRUAX and ARCC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer