PRUAX vs. EVUAX
Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Jennison Utility Fund (PRUAX) and Allspring Utility and Telecommunications Fund (EVUAX).
PRUAX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Jan 21, 1990. EVUAX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Jan 3, 1994.
Performance
PRUAX vs. EVUAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRUAX vs. EVUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRUAX PGIM Jennison Utility Fund | 6.96% | 11.47% | 39.83% | -3.96% | -0.18% | 14.89% | 4.14% | 27.06% | 1.14% | 13.78% |
EVUAX Allspring Utility and Telecommunications Fund | 4.92% | 15.41% | 17.68% | -5.17% | -3.47% | 13.95% | 4.19% | 54.25% | 3.25% | 13.66% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRUAX achieves a 6.96% return, which is significantly higher than EVUAX's 4.92% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PRUAX having a 11.25% annualized return and EVUAX not far behind at 11.08%.
PRUAX
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -3.94%
- YTD
- 6.96%
- 6M
- 4.81%
- 1Y
- 16.99%
- 3Y*
- 18.24%
- 5Y*
- 12.73%
- 10Y*
- 11.25%
EVUAX
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -4.30%
- YTD
- 4.92%
- 6M
- 3.81%
- 1Y
- 15.44%
- 3Y*
- 11.56%
- 5Y*
- 7.69%
- 10Y*
- 11.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRUAX vs. EVUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRUAX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than EVUAX's 1.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PRUAX vs. EVUAX — Risk / Return Rank
PRUAX
EVUAX
PRUAX vs. EVUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Utility Fund (PRUAX) and Allspring Utility and Telecommunications Fund (EVUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRUAX | EVUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.11 | 1.14 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.51 | 1.56 | -0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.22 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 2.15 | -0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.77 | 5.19 | -0.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRUAX | EVUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11 | 1.14 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.45 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.58 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.67 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRUAX and EVUAX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PRUAX vs. EVUAX - Dividend Comparison
PRUAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.61%, more than EVUAX's 5.77% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRUAX PGIM Jennison Utility Fund | 10.61% | 11.24% | 18.59% | 9.82% | 8.33% | 13.94% | 2.07% | 5.62% | 9.19% | 4.19% | 7.64% | 11.96% |
EVUAX Allspring Utility and Telecommunications Fund | 5.77% | 6.17% | 4.70% | 5.76% | 11.09% | 13.01% | 13.60% | 35.11% | 1.96% | 1.75% | 1.34% | 1.95% |
Drawdowns
PRUAX vs. EVUAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRUAX drawdown since its inception was -58.20%, roughly equal to the maximum EVUAX drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRUAX and EVUAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRUAX | EVUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.20% | -56.00% | -2.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.25% | -7.90% | -1.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.65% | -23.32% | +2.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.54% | -31.72% | -3.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.94% | -4.30% | +0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.45% | -9.60% | +0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.92% | 3.27% | +0.65% |
Volatility
PRUAX vs. EVUAX - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Jennison Utility Fund (PRUAX) has a higher volatility of 5.85% compared to Allspring Utility and Telecommunications Fund (EVUAX) at 4.79%. This indicates that PRUAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRUAX | EVUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.85% | 4.79% | +1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.31% | 9.44% | +1.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.38% | 14.63% | +1.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 17.01% | -0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.79% | 19.04% | -1.25% |