PRTO vs. RHRX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PRTO (RCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF) and RHRX (RH Tactical Rotation ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PRTO charges 0.82%/yr vs 1.36%/yr for RHRX.

Performance

PRTO vs. RHRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF (PRTO) and RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PRTO

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: 2.22%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RHRX

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 5.51%
• YTD: 21.23%
• 6M: 21.28%
• 1Y: 40.56%
• 3Y*: 22.82%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRTO vs. RHRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
PRTO RCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF	10.84%
RHRX RH Tactical Rotation ETF	16.74%

Correlation

The correlation between PRTO and RHRX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026	0.90

Return for Risk

PRTO vs. RHRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RHRX

RHRX Risk / Return Rank: 90
RHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
RHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
RHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
RHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
RHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRTO vs. RHRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF (PRTO) and RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PRTO	RHRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.09	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	5.07	0.53	+4.54

Drawdowns

PRTO vs. RHRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRTO drawdown since its inception was -2.98%, smaller than the maximum RHRX drawdown of -25.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRTO and RHRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRTO	RHRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.98%	-25.33%	+22.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.83%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	-0.40%	+0.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.54%	-8.95%	+8.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.74%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PRTO	RHRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.24%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.72%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.91%	13.18%	+0.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.91%	19.03%	-5.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.91%	19.03%	-5.12%

PRTO vs. RHRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRTO has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than RHRX's 1.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRTO vs. RHRX - Dividend Comparison

Neither PRTO nor RHRX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRTO and RHRX in my portfolio?

PRTO and RHRX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PRTO or RHRX?

On fees, PRTO is cheaper at 0.82% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PRTO or RHRX?

PRTO is cheaper with a 0.82% expense ratio, compared with 1.36% for RHRX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PRTO or RHRX?

PRTO and RHRX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between PRTO and RHRX?

They also come from different issuers: Tidal and Adaptive. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for PRTO and 1.36% for RHRX.