PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRSIX vs. VFMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRSIX vs. VFMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Spectrum Conservative Allocation Fund (PRSIX) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRSIX achieves a 5.01% return, which is significantly lower than VFMV's 8.57% return.


PRSIX

1D
1.14%
1M
0.19%
YTD
5.01%
6M
5.51%
1Y
12.50%
3Y*
10.58%
5Y*
4.58%
10Y*
6.84%

VFMV

1D
0.40%
1M
1.39%
YTD
8.57%
6M
7.81%
1Y
12.36%
3Y*
14.22%
5Y*
9.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRSIX vs. VFMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PRSIX
T. Rowe Price Spectrum Conservative Allocation Fund
5.01%11.91%8.53%11.97%-13.65%7.07%11.70%16.78%-3.35%
VFMV
Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF
8.57%10.52%16.91%8.86%-5.73%20.75%-0.19%27.26%-0.34%

Correlation

The correlation between PRSIX and VFMV is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2018

0.78

The correlation between PRSIX and VFMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRSIX vs. VFMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRSIX
PRSIX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
PRSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
PRSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

VFMV
VFMV Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
VFMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFMV Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
VFMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFMV Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRSIX vs. VFMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Spectrum Conservative Allocation Fund (PRSIX) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRSIXVFMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.25

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

2.07

+0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.28

8.03

+3.24

PRSIX vs. VFMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRSIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the VFMV Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRSIX and VFMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRSIX vs. VFMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRSIX drawdown since its inception was -30.00%, smaller than the maximum VFMV drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRSIX and VFMV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRSIXVFMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.00%

-33.64%

+3.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.02%

-6.00%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.80%

-10.35%

+3.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.69%

-15.41%

-3.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-0.98%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.82%

-3.63%

+0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.14%

1.55%

-0.41%

Volatility

PRSIX vs. VFMV - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Spectrum Conservative Allocation Fund (PRSIX) has a higher volatility of 2.52% compared to Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) at 2.30%. This indicates that PRSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRSIXVFMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.52%

2.30%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.24%

6.32%

-1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.14%

8.83%

-2.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.10%

11.75%

-4.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.42%

14.23%

-6.81%

PRSIX vs. VFMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRSIX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMV's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRSIX vs. VFMV - Dividend Comparison

PRSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.89%, more than VFMV's 1.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRSIX
T. Rowe Price Spectrum Conservative Allocation Fund
6.89%7.12%3.92%3.78%5.63%7.63%3.77%5.11%5.27%3.43%2.22%4.56%
VFMV
Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF
1.93%2.12%1.46%2.20%2.08%1.31%2.14%2.43%2.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRSIX and VFMV have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRSIX has higher volatility (2.52%) compared to VFMV (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRSIX dropped -30.00% vs VFMV's -33.64%.

PRSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRSIX and VFMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer