PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRS vs. SBUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PRS vs. SBUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRS) and Starbucks Corporation (SBUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRS achieves a -5.14% return, which is significantly lower than SBUX's 26.53% return.


PRS

1D
0.47%
1M
-0.89%
6M
-7.21%
YTD
-5.14%
1Y
-5.17%
3Y*
2.03%
5Y*
0.49%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.71%

SBUX

1D
-0.57%
1M
0.94%
6M
15.88%
YTD
26.53%
1Y
24.37%
3Y*
3.86%
5Y*
-0.53%
10Y*
8.63%
ALL TIME*
19.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$825.41K$865.34K$1.01M
$962.07M$807.87M$799.68M

PRS vs. SBUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PRS
Prudential Financial, Inc.
-5.14%8.75%-1.49%8.05%-5.95%0.21%10.13%21.72%-3.77%
SBUX
Starbucks Corporation
26.53%-5.26%-2.48%-1.19%-13.18%11.15%24.19%39.09%19.90%

Correlation

The correlation between PRS and SBUX is 0.16, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2018

0.26

The correlation between PRS and SBUX shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PRS:

$7.51B

SBUX:

$119.99B

EPS

PRS:

$9.87

SBUX:

$1.74

PE Ratio

PRS:

2.19

SBUX:

60.65

PS Ratio

PRS:

0.16

SBUX:

3.14

Total Revenue (TTM)

PRS:

$47.30B

SBUX:

$38.33B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PRS:

$20.22B

SBUX:

$12.17B

EBITDA (TTM)

PRS:

$4.13B

SBUX:

$5.60B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRS vs. SBUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PRS
PRS Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
PRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRS Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
PRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRS Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

SBUX
SBUX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SBUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBUX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SBUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBUX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PRS vs. SBUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRS) and Starbucks Corporation (SBUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRSSBUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.14

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.49

1.32

-1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.05

3.06

-4.11

PRS vs. SBUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRS Sharpe Ratio is -0.77, which is lower than the SBUX Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRS and SBUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRS vs. SBUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRS drawdown since its inception was -30.45%, smaller than the maximum SBUX drawdown of -81.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRS and SBUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRSSBUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.45%

-81.91%

+51.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.92%

-16.14%

+6.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.92%

-31.97%

+22.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.11%

-40.74%

+25.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.87%

-6.18%

-2.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.24%

-16.21%

+12.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.65%

6.93%

-2.28%

Volatility

PRS vs. SBUX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRS) is 1.98%, while Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) has a volatility of 6.41%. This indicates that PRS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRSSBUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.98%

6.41%

-4.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.01%

20.13%

-15.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.40%

28.42%

-22.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.09%

31.71%

-21.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.99%

29.50%

-15.51%

Dividends

PRS vs. SBUX - Dividend Comparison

PRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.15%, more than SBUX's 2.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRS
Prudential Financial, Inc.
6.52%5.90%6.05%5.64%4.31%5.18%4.94%5.16%1.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SBUX
Starbucks Corporation
2.35%2.91%2.54%2.25%2.02%1.57%1.57%1.69%2.05%1.83%1.53%1.13%

Financials

PRS vs. SBUX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Prudential Financial, Inc. and Starbucks Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PRS and SBUX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBUX has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to PRS (1.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRS dropped -30.45% vs SBUX's -81.91%.

SBUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.76 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRS and SBUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer