PRS vs. AIG
PRS (Prudential Financial, Inc.) and AIG (American International Group, Inc.) are both stocks. Over the past 5 years, PRS returned 0.50%/yr vs 12.21%/yr for AIG. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PRS vs. AIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRS achieves a -5.41% return, which is significantly higher than AIG's -9.42% return.
PRS
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- -2.89%
- YTD
- -5.41%
- 6M
- -5.54%
- 1Y
- -1.04%
- 3Y*
- 1.97%
- 5Y*
- 0.50%
- 10Y*
- —
AIG
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- YTD
- -9.42%
- 6M
- -10.51%
- 1Y
- -8.70%
- 3Y*
- 13.98%
- 5Y*
- 12.21%
- 10Y*
- 6.85%
PRS vs. AIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRS Prudential Financial, Inc. | -5.41% | 8.75% | -1.49% | 8.05% | -5.95% | 0.21% | 10.13% | 21.72% | -3.77% |
AIG American International Group, Inc. | -9.42% | 20.03% | 9.75% | 9.79% | 13.76% | 53.92% | -23.08% | 33.58% | -25.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRS and AIG is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2018 | 0.19 |
The correlation between PRS and AIG shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.21 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PRS:
$7.64B
AIG:
$41.49B
PRS:
$9.85
AIG:
$4.25
PRS:
2.22
AIG:
18.00
PRS:
0.16
AIG:
2.16
PRS:
$47.30B
AIG:
$20.00B
PRS:
$20.22B
AIG:
$7.09B
PRS:
$4.13B
AIG:
$5.81B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRS vs. AIG — Risk / Return Rank
PRS
AIG
PRS vs. AIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRS) and American International Group, Inc. (AIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRS | AIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 0.95 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | -0.51 | +0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.28 | -0.90 | +0.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRS vs. AIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRS drawdown since its inception was -30.45%, smaller than the maximum AIG drawdown of -99.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRS and AIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRS | AIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.45% | -99.64% | +69.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.13% | -16.98% | +7.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.13% | -16.98% | +7.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.11% | -26.45% | +11.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -69.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.13% | -93.73% | +84.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.17% | -51.26% | +48.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.67% | 9.71% | -6.04% |
Volatility
PRS vs. AIG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRS) is 2.06%, while American International Group, Inc. (AIG) has a volatility of 6.68%. This indicates that PRS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRS | AIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.06% | 6.68% | -4.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.68% | 17.44% | -12.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.57% | 23.78% | -17.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.07% | 26.46% | -16.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.06% | 32.55% | -18.49% |
Dividends
PRS vs. AIG - Dividend Comparison
PRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.43%, more than AIG's 2.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIG American International Group, Inc. | 2.42% | 2.05% | 2.14% | 2.07% | 2.02% | 2.25% | 3.38% | 2.49% | 3.25% | 2.15% | 1.96% | 1.31% |
PRS Prudential Financial, Inc. | 6.43% | 5.90% | 6.05% | 5.64% | 4.31% | 5.18% | 4.94% | 5.16% | 1.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
PRS vs. AIG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Prudential Financial, Inc. and American International Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PRS and AIG have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIG has higher volatility (6.68%) compared to PRS (2.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRS dropped -30.45% vs AIG's -99.64%.
PRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.16 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRS and AIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer