PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRS vs. AIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PRS vs. AIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRS) and American International Group, Inc. (AIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRS achieves a -4.25% return, which is significantly higher than AIG's -14.70% return.


PRS

1D
-0.90%
1M
-3.23%
YTD
-4.25%
6M
-4.69%
1Y
1.79%
3Y*
1.74%
5Y*
0.91%
10Y*

AIG

1D
-1.69%
1M
-6.46%
YTD
-14.70%
6M
-4.81%
1Y
-13.29%
3Y*
11.98%
5Y*
8.75%
10Y*
4.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRS vs. AIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PRS
Prudential Financial, Inc.
-4.25%8.75%-1.49%8.05%-5.95%0.21%10.13%21.72%-3.96%
AIG
American International Group, Inc.
-14.70%20.03%9.75%9.79%13.76%53.92%-23.08%33.58%-24.73%

Correlation

The correlation between PRS and AIG is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2018

0.20

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PRS:

$7.74B

AIG:

$39.34B

EPS

PRS:

$9.85

AIG:

$4.25

PE Ratio

PRS:

2.25

AIG:

17.06

PS Ratio

PRS:

0.16

AIG:

2.05

Total Revenue (TTM)

PRS:

$47.30B

AIG:

$20.00B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PRS:

$20.22B

AIG:

$7.09B

EBITDA (TTM)

PRS:

$4.13B

AIG:

$5.81B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRS vs. AIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRS
PRS Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
PRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRS Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
PRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRS Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

AIG
AIG Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
AIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIG Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
AIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIG Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRS vs. AIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRS) and American International Group, Inc. (AIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRSAIGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.27

-0.56

+0.83

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.44

-0.65

+1.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

0.92

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.22

-0.79

+1.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.56

-1.37

+1.94

PRS vs. AIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRS Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is higher than the AIG Sharpe Ratio of -0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRS and AIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRSAIGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

-0.56

+0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

0.33

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.05

+0.23

Drawdowns

PRS vs. AIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRS drawdown since its inception was -30.45%, smaller than the maximum AIG drawdown of -99.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRS and AIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRSAIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.45%

-99.64%

+69.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.01%

-16.98%

+8.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.38%

-16.98%

+7.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.11%

-26.45%

+11.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.01%

-94.10%

+86.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.14%

-51.21%

+48.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

9.70%

-6.53%

Volatility

PRS vs. AIG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRS) is 1.68%, while American International Group, Inc. (AIG) has a volatility of 5.70%. This indicates that PRS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRSAIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.68%

5.70%

-4.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.49%

18.27%

-13.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.63%

23.63%

-17.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.04%

26.58%

-16.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.10%

32.59%

-18.49%

Dividends

PRS vs. AIG - Dividend Comparison

PRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.35%, more than AIG's 2.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIG
American International Group, Inc.
2.48%2.05%2.14%2.07%2.02%2.25%3.38%2.49%3.25%2.15%1.96%1.31%
PRS
Prudential Financial, Inc.
6.35%5.90%6.05%5.64%4.31%5.18%4.94%5.16%1.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PRS vs. AIG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Prudential Financial, Inc. and American International Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B2022202320242025202600
(PRS) Total Revenue
(AIG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PRS and AIG have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIG has higher volatility (5.70%) compared to PRS (1.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRS dropped -30.45% vs AIG's -99.64%.

PRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.27 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRS and AIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer