PRPFX vs. VTMFX
PRPFX (Permanent Portfolio Class I) and VTMFX (Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. PRPFX is actively managed, while VTMFX is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PRPFX returned 10.52%/yr vs 8.63%/yr for VTMFX. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PRPFX charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VTMFX.
Performance
PRPFX vs. VTMFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRPFX achieves a 3.39% return, which is significantly lower than VTMFX's 5.44% return. Over the past 10 years, PRPFX has outperformed VTMFX with an annualized return of 10.52%, while VTMFX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.63% annualized return.
PRPFX
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- -2.56%
- YTD
- 3.39%
- 6M
- 3.56%
- 1Y
- 18.88%
- 3Y*
- 19.46%
- 5Y*
- 11.52%
- 10Y*
- 10.52%
VTMFX
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 1.20%
- YTD
- 5.44%
- 6M
- 5.61%
- 1Y
- 15.82%
- 3Y*
- 11.93%
- 5Y*
- 7.23%
- 10Y*
- 8.63%
PRPFX vs. VTMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRPFX Permanent Portfolio Class I | 3.39% | 28.78% | 19.36% | 11.96% | -5.48% | 10.87% | 18.80% | 19.20% | -7.02% | 11.42% |
VTMFX Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares | 5.44% | 11.28% | 12.17% | 15.55% | -12.69% | 13.10% | 13.31% | 18.01% | -1.40% | 12.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRPFX and VTMFX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 1994 | 0.63 |
The correlation between PRPFX and VTMFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.68 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRPFX vs. VTMFX — Risk / Return Rank
PRPFX
VTMFX
PRPFX vs. VTMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Permanent Portfolio Class I (PRPFX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRPFX | VTMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.47 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | 2.93 | -0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.66 | 13.72 | -8.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRPFX vs. VTMFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRPFX drawdown since its inception was -27.16%, roughly equal to the maximum VTMFX drawdown of -28.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRPFX and VTMFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRPFX | VTMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.16% | -28.49% | +1.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.40% | -5.38% | -3.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.40% | -10.61% | +2.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.49% | -17.40% | +1.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.84% | -21.87% | +1.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.50% | -0.56% | -6.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -3.54% | +0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.24% | 1.15% | +2.09% |
Volatility
PRPFX vs. VTMFX - Volatility Comparison
Permanent Portfolio Class I (PRPFX) has a higher volatility of 3.73% compared to Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX) at 2.50%. This indicates that PRPFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRPFX | VTMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.73% | 2.50% | +1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.63% | 5.21% | +6.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.90% | 6.45% | +6.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.10% | 8.57% | +2.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.66% | 9.15% | +1.51% |
PRPFX vs. VTMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRPFX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than VTMFX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRPFX vs. VTMFX - Dividend Comparison
PRPFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, more than VTMFX's 2.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRPFX Permanent Portfolio Class I | 3.16% | 3.27% | 1.86% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 2.05% | 5.38% | 4.69% | 6.90% | 2.14% | 0.95% | 7.06% |
VTMFX Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares | 2.12% | 2.14% | 2.08% | 1.94% | 1.85% | 1.38% | 1.72% | 2.05% | 2.22% | 2.00% | 2.13% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRPFX and VTMFX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRPFX has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to VTMFX (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRPFX dropped -27.16% vs VTMFX's -28.49%.
VTMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRPFX and VTMFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer