PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRNT vs. TINY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PRNT vs. TINY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) and ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PRNT vs. TINY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PRNT
ARK The 3D Printing ETF
-8.53%6.70%-8.72%13.37%-40.26%-7.25%
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
15.18%19.98%6.63%47.97%-34.14%8.73%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRNT achieves a -8.53% return, which is significantly lower than TINY's 15.18% return.


PRNT

1D
2.92%
1M
-9.58%
YTD
-8.53%
6M
-11.41%
1Y
6.65%
3Y*
-3.32%
5Y*
-12.29%
10Y*

TINY

1D
5.10%
1M
-9.41%
YTD
15.18%
6M
20.81%
1Y
62.94%
3Y*
21.31%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PRNT vs. TINY - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRNT has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than TINY's 0.58% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PRNT vs. TINY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRNT
PRNT Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
PRNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRNT Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
PRNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRNT Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

TINY
TINY Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
TINY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TINY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
TINY Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
TINY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
TINY Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRNT vs. TINY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) and ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRNTTINYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.27

1.78

-1.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.58

2.43

-1.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.31

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.31

3.62

-3.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.98

12.26

-11.28

PRNT vs. TINY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRNT Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the TINY Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRNT and TINY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRNTTINYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

1.78

-1.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

0.33

-0.30

Correlation

The correlation between PRNT and TINY is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

PRNT vs. TINY - Dividend Comparison

PRNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, more than TINY's 0.25% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PRNT
ARK The 3D Printing ETF
0.86%0.78%0.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.07%0.80%2.16%0.01%
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
0.25%0.29%0.01%0.35%0.42%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PRNT vs. TINY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRNT drawdown since its inception was -66.10%, which is greater than TINY's maximum drawdown of -43.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRNT and TINY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PRNTTINYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.10%

-43.79%

-22.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.22%

-16.75%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.57%

-12.51%

-46.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.59%

-16.68%

-14.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.46%

4.94%

+0.52%

Volatility

PRNT vs. TINY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) is 7.88%, while ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) has a volatility of 14.63%. This indicates that PRNT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TINY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PRNTTINYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.88%

14.63%

-6.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.00%

24.91%

-8.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.89%

35.60%

-10.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.03%

32.07%

-6.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.74%

32.07%

-5.33%