PRNT vs. TDV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PRNT (ARK The 3D Printing ETF) and TDV (ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - PRNT tracks the Total 3D-Printing Index while TDV tracks the Zacks 2040 Lifecycle Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PRNT returned -8.04%/yr vs 13.94%/yr for TDV. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.66% expense ratio.

Performance

PRNT vs. TDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) and ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRNT achieves a 13.07% return, which is significantly lower than TDV's 23.09% return.

PRNT

• 1D: -3.14%
• 1M: 10.65%
• YTD: 13.07%
• 6M: 13.65%
• 1Y: 19.68%
• 3Y*: 4.06%
• 5Y*: -8.04%
• 10Y*: —

TDV

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 10.03%
• YTD: 23.09%
• 6M: 21.07%
• 1Y: 36.07%
• 3Y*: 20.49%
• 5Y*: 13.94%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRNT vs. TDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PRNT ARK The 3D Printing ETF	13.07%	6.70%	-8.72%	13.37%	-40.26%	8.99%	40.18%	2.67%
TDV ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF	23.09%	16.05%	9.72%	27.29%	-15.94%	28.29%	29.00%	3.67%

Correlation

The correlation between PRNT and TDV is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2019	0.76

The correlation between PRNT and TDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PRNT vs. TDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PRNT	TDV
Technology	50.3%	90.2%
Industrials	27.4%	5.1%
Healthcare	13.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	5.4%	-
Basic Materials	3.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.1%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	4.7%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

PRNT vs. TDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRNT

PRNT Risk / Return Rank: 25
PRNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
PRNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
PRNT Omega Ratio Rank: 24
PRNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
PRNT Martin Ratio Rank: 25

TDV

TDV Risk / Return Rank: 65
TDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
TDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
TDV Omega Ratio Rank: 58
TDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
TDV Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRNT vs. TDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) and ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PRNT	TDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	2.10	-1.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.41	2.84	-1.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.36	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.15	3.79	-2.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.40	13.11	-9.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PRNT vs. TDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRNT Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the TDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRNT and TDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PRNT	TDV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89	2.10	-1.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.31	0.69	-1.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.11	0.76	-0.65

Drawdowns

PRNT vs. TDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRNT drawdown since its inception was -66.10%, which is greater than TDV's maximum drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRNT and TDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRNT	TDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.10%	-32.78%	-33.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.22%	-9.55%	-7.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.00%	-22.51%	-9.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.91%	-25.11%	-32.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.78%	-0.42%	-48.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.96%	-5.36%	-26.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.80%	2.76%	+3.04%

Volatility

PRNT vs. TDV - Volatility Comparison

ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) has a higher volatility of 7.92% compared to ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) at 5.07%. This indicates that PRNT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRNT	TDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.92%	5.07%	+2.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.01%	12.72%	+4.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.26%	17.29%	+4.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.07%	20.45%	+5.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.74%	23.20%	+3.54%

PRNT vs. TDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PRNT and TDV have an expense ratio of 0.66%.

Dividends

PRNT vs. TDV - Dividend Comparison

PRNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than TDV's 0.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
PRNT ARK The 3D Printing ETF	0.69%	0.78%	0.51%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.07%	0.80%	2.16%	0.01%
TDV ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF	0.93%	1.09%	1.16%	1.16%	1.67%	1.08%	1.10%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRNT and TDV in my portfolio?

PRNT and TDV have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PRNT or TDV?

PRNT has higher volatility (7.92%) compared to TDV (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRNT dropped -66.10% vs TDV's -32.78%.

Which ETF is better, PRNT or TDV?

On 5-year performance, TDV leads with 13.94% vs -8.04% for PRNT. Both ETFs have the same 0.66% expense ratio. On volatility, TDV has been the lower-risk option at 5.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PRNT or TDV?

Over the 5-year period, TDV has performed better with a 13.94% return vs -8.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PRNT or TDV?

PRNT and TDV have the same expense ratio: 0.66% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PRNT or TDV?

TDV has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.69% for PRNT.

What is the main difference between PRNT and TDV?

PRNT tracks Total 3D-Printing Index, while TDV tracks Zacks 2040 Lifecycle Index. They also come from different issuers: ARK and ProShares.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.