PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRNT vs. STHH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRNT vs. STHH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) and STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRNT achieves a 7.43% return, which is significantly lower than STHH's 184.91% return.


PRNT

1D
-1.06%
1M
-4.99%
YTD
7.43%
6M
7.02%
1Y
14.39%
3Y*
2.88%
5Y*
-9.44%
10Y*

STHH

1D
-0.98%
1M
9.64%
YTD
184.91%
6M
183.51%
1Y
147.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRNT vs. STHH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
PRNT
ARK The 3D Printing ETF
7.43%22.16%
STHH
STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged
184.91%17.60%

Correlation

The correlation between PRNT and STHH is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2025

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRNT vs. STHH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRNT
PRNT Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
PRNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRNT Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
PRNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRNT Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

STHH
STHH Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
STHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
STHH Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
STHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
STHH Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRNT vs. STHH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) and STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRNTSTHHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.45

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

4.37

-3.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.41

9.88

-7.47

PRNT vs. STHH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRNT Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the STHH Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRNT and STHH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRNT vs. STHH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRNT drawdown since its inception was -66.10%, which is greater than STHH's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRNT and STHH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRNTSTHHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.10%

-33.89%

-32.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.22%

-33.89%

+16.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.34%

-9.01%

-42.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.05%

-10.17%

-21.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.99%

14.94%

-8.95%

Volatility

PRNT vs. STHH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) is 9.13%, while STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH) has a volatility of 25.53%. This indicates that PRNT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STHH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRNTSTHHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.13%

25.53%

-16.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.49%

41.17%

-22.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.06%

52.69%

-29.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.20%

51.44%

-25.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.77%

51.44%

-24.67%

PRNT vs. STHH - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRNT has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than STHH's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRNT vs. STHH - Dividend Comparison

PRNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, more than STHH's 0.71% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PRNT
ARK The 3D Printing ETF
0.73%0.78%0.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.07%0.80%2.16%0.01%
STHH
STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged
0.71%0.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRNT and STHH have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STHH has higher volatility (25.53%) compared to PRNT (9.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRNT dropped -66.10% vs STHH's -33.89%.

On 1-year performance, STHH leads with 147.03% vs 14.39% for PRNT. On fees, STHH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, PRNT has been the lower-risk option at 9.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, STHH has performed better with a 147.03% return vs 14.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

STHH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for PRNT.

PRNT has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.71% for STHH.

PRNT tracks Total 3D-Printing Index, while STHH tracks STMicroelectronics NV Local Shares Total Return. They also come from different issuers: ARK and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for PRNT and 0.19% for STHH.

STHH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRNT and STHH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer