PRN vs. XMMO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PRN (Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF) and XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds from Invesco - PRN tracks the DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index while XMMO tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PRN returned 18.51%/yr vs 19.73%/yr for XMMO. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PRN charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMMO.

Performance

PRN vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRN achieves a 41.80% return, which is significantly higher than XMMO's 23.73% return. Over the past 10 years, PRN has underperformed XMMO with an annualized return of 18.51%, while XMMO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.73% annualized return.

PRN

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: 6.86%
• YTD: 41.80%
• 6M: 45.38%
• 1Y: 65.12%
• 3Y*: 36.96%
• 5Y*: 20.18%
• 10Y*: 18.51%

XMMO

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 6.87%
• YTD: 23.73%
• 6M: 25.73%
• 1Y: 36.97%
• 3Y*: 32.10%
• 5Y*: 16.69%
• 10Y*: 19.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRN vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF	41.80%	13.74%	30.35%	37.96%	-25.09%	25.21%	36.39%	34.52%	-16.19%	22.82%
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF	23.73%	13.04%	38.03%	20.39%	-16.02%	16.69%	29.17%	36.78%	6.12%	37.18%

Correlation

The correlation between PRN and XMMO is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2006	0.84

The correlation between PRN and XMMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

PRN vs. XMMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PRN	XMMO
Industrials	79.3%	41.1%
Technology	19.4%	16.7%
Basic Materials	1.8%	7.2%
Energy	1.6%	7.7%
Consumer Cyclical	1.2%	4.6%
Financial Services	0.1%	2.4%
Communication Services	-	1.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.5%
Healthcare	-	6.3%
Real Estate	-	6.1%
Utilities	-	5.8%

Return for Risk

PRN vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRN

PRN Risk / Return Rank: 70
PRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
PRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
PRN Omega Ratio Rank: 60
PRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
PRN Martin Ratio Rank: 78

XMMO

XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 67
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRN vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PRN	XMMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.29	1.99	+0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	2.77	+0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.35	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.63	4.45	+0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.45	18.21	-2.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PRN vs. XMMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRN Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the XMMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRN and XMMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PRN	XMMO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.29	1.99	+0.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81	0.78	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77	0.89	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.58	-0.05

Drawdowns

PRN vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRN drawdown since its inception was -59.88%, which is greater than XMMO's maximum drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRN and XMMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRN	XMMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.88%	-55.37%	-4.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.15%	-8.34%	-5.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.78%	-24.93%	-5.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.84%	-27.91%	-6.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.27%	-36.74%	+0.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.47%	0.00%	-0.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.84%	-9.45%	-1.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.23%	2.04%	+2.19%

Volatility

PRN vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) has a higher volatility of 10.95% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) at 7.82%. This indicates that PRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRN	XMMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.95%	7.82%	+3.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.22%	15.54%	+7.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.66%	18.71%	+9.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.03%	21.45%	+3.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.17%	22.27%	+1.90%

PRN vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRN has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRN vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

PRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than XMMO's 0.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF	0.11%	0.17%	0.39%	0.52%	0.82%	0.11%	0.10%	0.42%	0.29%	0.60%	0.57%	0.44%
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF	0.60%	0.78%	0.34%	0.80%	1.43%	0.41%	0.61%	0.60%	0.19%	0.21%	0.22%	0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRN and XMMO in my portfolio?

PRN and XMMO have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PRN or XMMO?

PRN has higher volatility (10.95%) compared to XMMO (7.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRN dropped -59.88% vs XMMO's -55.37%.

Which ETF is better, PRN or XMMO?

On 10-year performance, XMMO leads with 19.73% vs 18.51% for PRN. On fees, XMMO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XMMO has been the lower-risk option at 7.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PRN or XMMO?

Over the 10-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 19.73% return vs 18.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PRN or XMMO?

XMMO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PRN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PRN or XMMO?

XMMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.11% for PRN.

What is the main difference between PRN and XMMO?

PRN tracks DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index, while XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PRN and 0.35% for XMMO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.