PRN vs. VOO
PRN (Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PRN is a Momentum fund tracking the DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PRN returned 19.03%/yr vs 15.61%/yr for VOO. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PRN charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
PRN vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRN achieves a 45.08% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 8.19% return. Over the past 10 years, PRN has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 19.03%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 15.61% annualized return.
PRN
- 1D
- -3.57%
- 1M
- 6.97%
- YTD
- 45.08%
- 6M
- 39.29%
- 1Y
- 65.87%
- 3Y*
- 36.27%
- 5Y*
- 20.84%
- 10Y*
- 19.03%
VOO
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- 8.19%
- 6M
- 7.24%
- 1Y
- 23.69%
- 3Y*
- 20.78%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- 15.61%
PRN vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF | 45.08% | 13.74% | 30.35% | 37.96% | -25.09% | 25.21% | 36.39% | 34.52% | -16.19% | 22.82% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 8.19% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRN and VOO is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.80 |
The correlation between PRN and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PRN vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PRN
VOO
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
PRN
VOO
Technology
PRN
VOO
Basic Materials
PRN
VOO
Energy
PRN
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
PRN
VOO
Financial Services
PRN
VOO
Communication Services
PRN
-
VOO
Consumer Defensive
PRN
-
VOO
Healthcare
PRN
-
VOO
Real Estate
PRN
-
VOO
Utilities
PRN
-
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRN vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
PRN
VOO
PRN vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRN | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.35 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.68 | 2.67 | +2.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.34 | 11.96 | +3.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRN vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRN drawdown since its inception was -59.88%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRN and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRN | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.88% | -33.99% | -25.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.15% | -8.90% | -5.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.78% | -18.69% | -12.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.84% | -24.52% | -10.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.27% | -33.99% | -2.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.57% | -3.14% | -0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.82% | -3.68% | -7.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.31% | 1.99% | +2.32% |
Volatility
PRN vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) has a higher volatility of 12.02% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.83%. This indicates that PRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRN | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.02% | 4.83% | +7.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.35% | 9.82% | +14.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.47% | 12.46% | +18.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.41% | 16.91% | +8.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.38% | 18.02% | +6.36% |
PRN vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRN has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRN vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
PRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than VOO's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF | 0.08% | 0.17% | 0.39% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.60% | 0.57% | 0.44% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRN and VOO have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRN has higher volatility (12.02%) compared to VOO (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRN dropped -59.88% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 10-year performance, PRN leads with 19.03% vs 15.61% for VOO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PRN has performed better with a 19.03% return vs 15.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PRN.
VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.08% for PRN.
PRN is categorized as Momentum, while VOO is S&P 500. PRN tracks DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PRN and 0.03% for VOO.
PRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRN and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer