PRN vs. SMOM
PRN (Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF) and SMOM (Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PRN is a Momentum fund tracking the DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index, while SMOM is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Symmetry Partners. PRN is passively managed, while SMOM is actively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PRN charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for SMOM.
Performance
PRN vs. SMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRN achieves a 28.56% return, which is significantly higher than SMOM's 8.50% return.
PRN
- 1D
- -2.58%
- 1M
- -8.24%
- 6M
- 18.73%
- YTD
- 28.56%
- 1Y
- 43.53%
- 3Y*
- 28.59%
- 5Y*
- 18.48%
- 10Y*
- 16.81%
SMOM
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- 6M
- 6.81%
- YTD
- 8.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PRN vs. SMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF | 28.56% | 7.15% |
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 8.50% | 2.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRN and SMOM is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRN vs. SMOM — Risk / Return Rank
PRN
SMOM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PRN vs. SMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF (SMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRN | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.10 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRN vs. SMOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRN drawdown since its inception was -59.88%, which is greater than SMOM's maximum drawdown of -7.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRN and SMOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRN | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.88% | -7.45% | -52.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.55% | -1.20% | -13.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.81% | -1.52% | -9.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.80% | — | — |
Volatility
PRN vs. SMOM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRN | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.86% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.01% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.16% | 12.55% | +19.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.80% | 12.55% | +13.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.58% | 12.55% | +12.03% |
PRN vs. SMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRN has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than SMOM's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRN vs. SMOM - Dividend Comparison
PRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than SMOM's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF | 0.09% | 0.17% | 0.39% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.60% | 0.57% | 0.44% |
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 0.15% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRN and SMOM have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PRN is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PRN is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for SMOM.
SMOM has the higher dividend yield at 0.15%, compared with 0.09% for PRN.
PRN is categorized as Momentum, while SMOM is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Symmetry Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PRN and 0.63% for SMOM.
Find the right allocation for PRN and SMOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer