PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRN vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRN vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRN achieves a 41.80% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 21.30% return. Over the past 10 years, PRN has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 18.51%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.94% annualized return.


PRN

1D
0.59%
1M
6.86%
YTD
41.80%
6M
45.38%
1Y
65.12%
3Y*
36.96%
5Y*
20.18%
10Y*
18.51%

QQQ

1D
-0.26%
1M
10.60%
YTD
21.30%
6M
19.66%
1Y
41.82%
3Y*
28.78%
5Y*
17.97%
10Y*
21.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRN vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRN
Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF
41.80%13.74%30.35%37.96%-25.09%25.21%36.39%34.52%-16.19%22.82%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
21.30%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between PRN and QQQ is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2006

0.73

The correlation between PRN and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

PRN vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PRN
QQQ

Industrials

79.3%
2.8%

Technology

19.4%
53.8%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.1%

Energy

1.6%
0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

1.2%
12.3%

Financial Services

0.1%
0.2%

Communication Services

-

15.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Industrials

PRN
79.3%
QQQ
2.8%

Technology

PRN
19.4%
QQQ
53.8%

Basic Materials

PRN
1.8%
QQQ
1.1%

Energy

PRN
1.6%
QQQ
0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

PRN
1.2%
QQQ
12.3%

Financial Services

PRN
0.1%
QQQ
0.2%

Communication Services

PRN

-

QQQ
15.8%

Consumer Defensive

PRN

-

QQQ
7.7%

Healthcare

PRN

-

QQQ
4.2%

Real Estate

PRN

-

QQQ
0.1%

Utilities

PRN

-

QQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRN vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRN
PRN Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
PRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRN Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
PRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRN Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRN vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRNQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.45

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.63

3.51

+1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.45

13.49

+1.95

PRN vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRN Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRN and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRNQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

2.64

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.81

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.99

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.41

+0.11

Drawdowns

PRN vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRN drawdown since its inception was -59.88%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRN and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRNQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.88%

-82.97%

+23.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.15%

-11.96%

-2.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.78%

-22.77%

-8.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.84%

-35.12%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.27%

-35.12%

-1.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-0.26%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.84%

-32.79%

+21.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.23%

3.11%

+1.12%

Volatility

PRN vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) has a higher volatility of 10.95% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.49%. This indicates that PRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRNQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.95%

4.49%

+6.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.22%

12.10%

+11.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.66%

15.94%

+12.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.03%

22.38%

+2.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.17%

22.29%

+1.88%

PRN vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRN has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRN vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

PRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than QQQ's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRN
Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF
0.11%0.17%0.39%0.52%0.82%0.11%0.10%0.42%0.29%0.60%0.57%0.44%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRN and QQQ have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRN has higher volatility (10.95%) compared to QQQ (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRN dropped -59.88% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.94% vs 18.51% for PRN. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.94% return vs 18.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PRN.

QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.11% for PRN.

PRN is categorized as Momentum, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. PRN tracks DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PRN and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRN and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer