PRN vs. PTH

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PRN (Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF) and PTH (Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds from Invesco - PRN tracks the DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index while PTH tracks the Dorsey Wright Healthcare Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PRN returned 19.03%/yr vs 14.65%/yr for PTH. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.

Performance

PRN vs. PTH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRN achieves a 45.08% return, which is significantly higher than PTH's 10.66% return. Over the past 10 years, PRN has outperformed PTH with an annualized return of 19.03%, while PTH has yielded a comparatively lower 14.65% annualized return.

PRN

• 1D: -3.57%
• 1M: 6.97%
• YTD: 45.08%
• 6M: 39.29%
• 1Y: 65.87%
• 3Y*: 36.27%
• 5Y*: 20.84%
• 10Y*: 19.03%

PTH

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: 7.38%
• YTD: 10.66%
• 6M: 8.96%
• 1Y: 47.97%
• 3Y*: 12.29%
• 5Y*: 0.29%
• 10Y*: 14.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRN vs. PTH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF	45.08%	13.74%	30.35%	37.96%	-25.09%	25.21%	36.39%	34.52%	-16.19%	22.82%
PTH Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF	10.66%	27.91%	2.36%	-4.54%	-20.61%	-3.20%	67.26%	34.45%	-1.23%	50.15%

Correlation

The correlation between PRN and PTH is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2006	0.66

The correlation between PRN and PTH shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PRN vs. PTH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PRN	PTH
Industrials	78.2%	-
Technology	20.4%	-
Basic Materials	1.8%	-
Energy	1.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	1.2%	-
Financial Services	0.1%	0.2%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Healthcare	-	99.8%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

PRN vs. PTH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRN

PRN Risk / Return Rank: 72
PRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
PRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
PRN Omega Ratio Rank: 61
PRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
PRN Martin Ratio Rank: 81

PTH

PTH Risk / Return Rank: 66
PTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
PTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
PTH Omega Ratio Rank: 58
PTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
PTH Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRN vs. PTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PRN	PTH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.18	2.00	+0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.72	2.78	-0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.33	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.68	4.02	+0.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.34	10.05	+5.29

PRN vs. PTH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRN Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the PTH Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRN and PTH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PRN vs. PTH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRN drawdown since its inception was -59.88%, which is greater than PTH's maximum drawdown of -53.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRN and PTH.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRN	PTH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.88%	-53.52%	-6.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.15%	-11.98%	-2.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.78%	-28.09%	-2.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.84%	-50.07%	+15.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.27%	-53.52%	+17.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.57%	-9.70%	+6.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.82%	-16.99%	+6.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.31%	4.79%	-0.48%

Volatility

PRN vs. PTH - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) has a higher volatility of 12.02% compared to Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH) at 9.29%. This indicates that PRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRN	PTH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.02%	9.29%	+2.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.35%	18.85%	+5.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.47%	24.06%	+6.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.41%	25.57%	-0.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.38%	27.30%	-2.92%

PRN vs. PTH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PRN and PTH have an expense ratio of 0.60%.

Dividends

PRN vs. PTH - Dividend Comparison

PRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than PTH's 2.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF	0.08%	0.17%	0.39%	0.52%	0.82%	0.11%	0.10%	0.42%	0.29%	0.60%	0.57%	0.44%
PTH Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF	2.78%	3.07%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRN and PTH in my portfolio?

PRN and PTH have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PRN or PTH?

PRN has higher volatility (12.02%) compared to PTH (9.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRN dropped -59.88% vs PTH's -53.52%.

Which ETF is better, PRN or PTH?

On 10-year performance, PRN leads with 19.03% vs 14.65% for PTH. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, PTH has been the lower-risk option at 9.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PRN or PTH?

Over the 10-year period, PRN has performed better with a 19.03% return vs 14.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PRN or PTH?

PRN and PTH have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PRN or PTH?

PTH has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 0.08% for PRN.

What is the main difference between PRN and PTH?

PRN tracks DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index, while PTH tracks Dorsey Wright Healthcare Technical Leaders Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.