PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTH vs. FHLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTH vs. FHLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH) and Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTH achieves a 20.92% return, which is significantly higher than FHLC's 8.07% return. Over the past 10 years, PTH has outperformed FHLC with an annualized return of 14.31%, while FHLC has yielded a comparatively lower 9.91% annualized return.


PTH

1D
0.82%
1M
-1.26%
6M
24.48%
YTD
20.92%
1Y
63.78%
3Y*
18.86%
5Y*
1.68%
10Y*
14.31%
ALL TIME*
10.78%

FHLC

1D
1.09%
1M
0.87%
6M
7.73%
YTD
8.07%
1Y
28.14%
3Y*
9.88%
5Y*
5.16%
10Y*
9.91%
ALL TIME*
10.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$14.35M$17.75M$15.99M
$2.85M$5.26M$2.68M

PTH vs. FHLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PTH
Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF
20.92%27.91%2.36%-4.54%-20.61%-3.20%67.26%34.45%-1.23%50.15%
FHLC
Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF
8.07%15.42%2.48%2.58%-5.55%20.39%18.13%21.94%4.71%23.34%

Correlation

The correlation between PTH and FHLC is 0.50, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between PTH and FHLC has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PTH vs. FHLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PTH
FHLC

Healthcare

100.0%
98.9%

Financial Services

1.2%
0.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Industrials

-

0.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

0.4%

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

PTH
100.0%
FHLC
98.9%

Financial Services

PTH
1.2%
FHLC
0.0%

Basic Materials

PTH

-

FHLC

-

Communication Services

PTH

-

FHLC

-

Consumer Cyclical

PTH

-

FHLC

-

Consumer Defensive

PTH

-

FHLC

-

Energy

PTH

-

FHLC

-

Industrials

PTH

-

FHLC
0.0%

Real Estate

PTH

-

FHLC

-

Technology

PTH

-

FHLC
0.4%

Utilities

PTH

-

FHLC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTH vs. FHLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PTH
PTH Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
PTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTH Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
PTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTH Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

FHLC
FHLC Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FHLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHLC Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FHLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHLC Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PTH vs. FHLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH) and Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PTHFHLCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.32

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.35

2.72

+2.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.20

6.78

+6.42

PTH vs. FHLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTH Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the FHLC Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTH and FHLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PTH vs. FHLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTH drawdown since its inception was -53.52%, which is greater than FHLC's maximum drawdown of -28.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTH and FHLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTHFHLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.52%

-28.76%

-24.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.98%

-10.38%

-1.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.51%

-16.87%

-10.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.07%

-17.73%

-32.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.52%

-28.76%

-24.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.55%

-1.58%

-0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.91%

-5.15%

-11.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.85%

4.17%

+0.68%

Volatility

PTH vs. FHLC - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH) has a higher volatility of 8.99% compared to Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) at 4.79%. This indicates that PTH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTHFHLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.99%

4.79%

+4.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.13%

11.68%

+8.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.91%

15.11%

+9.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.74%

15.26%

+10.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.41%

16.90%

+10.51%

PTH vs. FHLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTH has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLC's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTH vs. FHLC - Dividend Comparison

PTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than FHLC's 1.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHLC
Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF
1.28%1.40%1.51%1.40%1.30%1.16%1.45%1.18%1.38%1.38%1.40%2.07%
PTH
Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF
2.54%3.07%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTH and FHLC have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTH has higher volatility (8.99%) compared to FHLC (4.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTH dropped -53.52% vs FHLC's -28.76%.

On 10-year performance, PTH leads with 14.31% vs 9.91% for FHLC. On fees, FHLC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FHLC has been the lower-risk option at 4.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PTH has performed better with a 14.31% return vs 9.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FHLC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTH.

PTH has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 1.28% for FHLC.

PTH is categorized as Momentum, while FHLC is Health & Biotech Equities. PTH tracks Dorsey Wright Healthcare Technical Leaders Index, while FHLC tracks MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTH and 0.08% for FHLC.

PTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTH and FHLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer